We performed a comparison between Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response and Trend Vision One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The stability is very good."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"I've mainly found the antivirus and antispyware features valuable. The documentation is okay as well."
"The most valuable feature is that the same agent can act as the endpoint detection and response agent."
"The Detection vulnerability is very effective."
"The solution is scalable."
"The pricing is good."
"The security is good."
"The solution can scale well."
"The most valuable features of Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response are its immediate response and investigation."
"VisionOne offers a clear window into the security posture of our endpoints."
"The most important thing for us as a customer is that we can spend more time in other places as it's simpler to have that overview. We have much more time for other tasks."
"For scalability, I would give a rating of ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature is the network protection shield on every server, which isolates attacks and prevents our clients from being affected."
"I like Vision One's observed attack techniques feature. It lets you see what an attacker is doing, how they have tried to exploit a machine, or how malicious code is operating. It helps us discover indicators of compromise so we can write better rules for detection."
"It has good vulnerability protection."
"I can prevent my environment from different types of attacks based on what I see in the Vision One console."
"Trend Micro XDR is a comprehensive solution that is not overly complex to use or manage."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"I think cloud security and SASE are areas of concern in the product where improvements are required. The tool's cloud version has to be improved in terms of the security it offers."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The solution is not stable."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"The network forensics feature could be improved."
"Technical support is not as good as we expect, and resolving problems should be more timely."
"Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response could improve the reporting. It is very difficult to create reports from the user interface."
"The Symantec portfolio is not big enough to cover the organization in all 360 degrees."
"The GUI could be better."
"While they are quite dynamic, they need to ensure they are detecting threats faster in the future to keep people safer."
"It would be nice to see more granular timeline analysis."
"The product doesn’t offer MDM functionality under its current licensing model."
"The zero trust is a bit complicated compared to other parts of the solution."
"The centralized dashboard has room for improvement."
"The integration with third-party tools and with on-premises Active Directory needs improvement."
"The solution could always be made to be more secure."
"Results were delayed."
"In new versions I would like to see better implementation of the reporting features, especially in regards to EDR visibility."
"The area for improvement is mobile security. We have just finished a proof of concept for Zero Trust Secure Access. We withdrew from this PoC because it does not have that many points for proxy across Europe. Our organization is across Europe... At this time, they are only located in Germany and the UK."
"We'd like to see a few more integrations."
More Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →
Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is ranked 25th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 28 reviews while Trend Vision One is ranked 5th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 43 reviews. Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is rated 7.6, while Trend Vision One is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response writes "A highly stable and affordable solution for detecting and preventing security threats". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One writes "The integration of toolsets is key, enabling automation, and vendor has been tremendous partner for us". Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert, Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and CrowdStrike Falcon, whereas Trend Vision One is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Trend Micro Apex One, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Microsoft Defender XDR and Elastic Security. See our Symantec Endpoint Detection and Response vs. Trend Vision One report.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.