We performed a comparison between Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) and Trend Micro Apex One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"What I like most about McAfee MVISION Endpoint is that it's very user-friendly. You do need some knowledge on how to navigate the portal, but as soon as you've gained that knowledge, navigation will no longer be an issue. I have no complaints about McAfee MVISION Endpoint. For me, the product is perfect the way it is. It's great right now, and it's doing good as it is."
"The investigation and forensic analysis have been most helpful."
"The features we have found most valuable have been containment as well as the ability to triage agent activities."
"Provides good mobile device protection."
"It is scalable and stable and the initial setup is the easiest part of using the product."
"The most valuable network security feature is the network sandbox solution. This sandbox feature works on traffic flow."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its dashboard."
"The response part of EDR was most valuable. We used that to separate the endpoint from the network. We utilized the solution during the instant response. We were also utilizing advanced malware detection capabilities, but we benefited the most from its help with the response."
"One of the advantages for me is that it is very easy to use."
"Offers great application control, vulnerability protection, and behavior monitoring."
"Many features that this solution has, competitors lack. The feature I think is quite good is data loss prevention."
"The graphical user interface is simple, making it easy to navigate without the need for additional training or complex documentation."
"The solution is stable and integrated into the system quite well."
"The most valuable feature is that it's normal, and not for a specific server."
"Stability-wise, it is a good product, and I rate it a ten out of ten."
"The end user perspective is very good because the solution isn't complex to learn and support is readily available."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"Detections could be improved."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve by an overall simplification of the solution."
"I would like to see more local integration for the applications that we use."
"Impacts performance of the servers quite negatively."
"The product is consolidating its portfolio into one product. It is difficult at the moment."
"Intrusion detection and intervention seem to be falling behind the competition."
"The product needs to reduce the usage of RAM and CPU."
"Search feature could be made more user-friendly."
"I would like to see simple processing and reporting online."
"In the next release, I would like to see IBS included in OfficeScan."
"They could improve the integration with Active Directory."
"I would like to have DLP features implemented into Apex One."
"It should have a single agent as competitors are offering."
"The solution could improve security. It is important to always keep the organization secure."
"The reporting can be improved. We'd like to have had broader insights as to what was happening on a machine."
"The solution needs to have SDR in it. So, SDR is an area where the solution needs to work and improve itself."
"The menus can be more user-friendly or easier. For example, if we want to enable access to the USB ports, it should be more user-friendly. It is not easy. We need to navigate through several menus to be able to give access."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 19th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 49 reviews while Trend Micro Apex One is ranked 6th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 124 reviews. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6, while Trend Micro Apex One is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "Reliable with good independent modules and a straightforward setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Apex One writes "Good monitoring and server protection with helpful machine learning". Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon and Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), whereas Trend Micro Apex One is most compared with Trend Micro Deep Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike Falcon and Trend Micro Smart Protection. See our Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. Trend Micro Apex One report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.