We performed a comparison between Trellix Endpoint Security and Trend Vision One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The visibility into threats is also very impressive because Microsoft helps you predict things and provides analytics to help you really improve your security. And all of this technology works across the domain, so it is pretty helpful in terms of threat analytics."
"It has been great for us. Previously, we didn't have a solution to protect us, especially from malware, whereas now, we are getting protection up front, especially from the malware attacks coming through emails or endpoints."
"There is also one dashboard that shows us the status of many controls at once and the details I can get... It gives a great overview of many areas, such as files, emails, chats, and links. Even with the apps, it gives you a great overview. In one place you can see where you should look into things more deeply..."
"The integration, visibility, vulnerability management, and device identification are valuable."
"Microsoft 365 Defender is a stable solution."
"I like the easy integration and advanced possibilities. We can implement it at customer sites in a few clicks, but we can also dive deep and drill down to extended features. There's a very good starting point to get into this product and all the features from Defender."
"I have found the ability to delete unwanted threats beneficial."
"We can use Defender to block and monitor for security purposes without needing multiple other products to do different tasks."
"A big advantage of McAfee Endpoint Security is the ability to manage very big environments. We are supporting environments with 200,000 to 300,000 endpoints. The ability to manage with one single console is very important for us. McAfee has phenomenally improved in terms of detection. It provides real-time detection and response with the error, Real Protect, and reputations. It is not only based on signatures but also on behavior analytics, artificial intelligence, or machine learning. We have environments that never had issues with ransomware in the last 20 years. McAfee has a very good performance in this field."
"We can manage everything from the central console and it is very easy."
"It can be deployed quickly, and it's scalable. Those are the two advantages of it."
"The most valuable feature of Trellix Endpoint Security is containment, which takes less than a minute."
"The most valuable feature is ease of use."
"Their malware detection rate is excellent for all type of devices and the anti-theft products are good and easy to use."
"The product’s stability and security features enhance user protection and organizational security."
"The solution is broken down into different components from the portals. Web filtering, which is an added feature has been great for us."
"Its detection rate is valuable. It is really an easy product to install and manage. It is quite effective at what it does, and if needed, it can also be co-managed, which means 24 hours and seven days a week monitoring through a SOC."
"The automatic EDR system that notifies us when something is wrong is valuable."
"XDR provided a much more deep view into what is actually happening."
"Trend Micro XDR is a comprehensive solution that is not overly complex to use or manage."
"The most important thing for us as a customer is that we can spend more time in other places as it's simpler to have that overview. We have much more time for other tasks."
"They were one of the companies, early on, that spent a lot of time integrating their toolsets, and I was really impressed with that... the endpoint management system could reach out to the Deep Discovery system on the network and pick up something that it perceived as a suspicious object."
"What I like the most about Trend Micro XDR is that the detection and response domain extends to the network. It goes beyond the endpoint and includes data about the network which lets you pinpoint patient zero as well as the root cause of the attack."
"Scaling is not a problem at all."
"The design of the user interface could use some work. Sometimes it's hard to find the exact information you need."
"Microsoft 365 Defender does not have a unique package with emerging endpoint security technologies, such as EDR and XDR."
"When we do investigations, it would be better if Microsoft could populate the host dashboard more. When we open any host for investigation, we want the entire timeline of what is happening on the host, including all the users logging in, their hardware, Windows version, etc."
"The only issue I've had is, when it comes to deployment, the steps I must take around policy setup. That is challenging."
"The abundance of sub-dashboards and sub-areas within the main dashboard can be confusing, even if it all technically makes sense."
"I'd like to see a wider solution that includes not only desktop devices but also other devices, such as servers, storage cabinets, switching equipment, et cetera."
"The web filtering solution needs to be improved because currently, it is very simple."
"Microsoft tends to provide too many features, which makes the solution prone to bugs."
"Technical support from the vendor is very bad."
"I would like this solution to do what Palo Alto traps does because I would only need to run this one product."
"The initial setup is complex. It is a very complex product. You must have experience with it."
"Every time we open a ticket with McAfee, their response differs and they are not consistent."
"There are two main areas that require improvement. One is the size of the packages. Although I'll admit manageability is good, if I want to deploy, let's say just the antivirus or just the firewall, each of those package sizes are quite large. They are sometimes as big as 200MB or 250MB. When I have operations in remote areas where connectivity is always poor, it's difficult. To deploy such a package in a remote location over the internet or something like that is always challenging."
"Although they have increased the complexity, it has affected the scanning speed."
"We have had some of our clients not happy with McAfee Endpoint Security because it blocks some of the applications they are trying to use. They should make it easier to unblock applications."
"Support-wise they need to be better."
"Having more variables within the playbook would be useful. It would allow us to have more refined playbooks for the business. It would allow us to take stronger action through a playbook. It will give us confidence to target a particular area of business where our risk tolerance might be higher or lower. We would like to have more granular playbooks."
"The support documentation could be more comprehensive."
"The information captured by Trend Vision One needs to be more detailed."
"Also, XDR should improve its coverage of the latest IOCs. Their suspicious object management works, but the coverage should be improved. It will take one or two months to get those things covered. XDR will detect on a behavioral basis, but these databases will not get updated daily like some other solutions. If you're dealing with new ransomware or malware, it may take around a month before it's covered by Trend Micro."
"While the continuous addition of features is commendable, the sheer volume of changes makes it difficult to stay abreast of the latest developments."
"They have a DLP module in Tredn Moicros and they need to enhance its capabilities."
"They should increase their potential for third-party integrations."
"The integration with third-party tools and with on-premises Active Directory needs improvement."
Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 10th in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 94 reviews while Trend Vision One is ranked 6th in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 42 reviews. Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0, while Trend Vision One is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "Good user behavioral analysis and helpful patching but needs better support services". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One writes "The integration of toolsets is key, enabling automation, and vendor has been tremendous partner for us". Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Deep Security, whereas Trend Vision One is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Trend Micro Apex One, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. See our Trellix Endpoint Security vs. Trend Vision One report.
See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
