We performed a comparison between webMethods.io Integration and WSO2 API Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"The solution is scalable."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"The flexibility is definitely a highlight. We have flexible mapping capabilities, allowing us to provide common mappings or create custom ones as needed."
"The solution is stable."
"The solution is open-source."
"Its open-source features are very good, especially for your production work."
"It's a good product."
"Most of the time, we need to install a plug-in without having any lapse in services or restarting the application. The WSO2 platform can do all deployments without any downtime."
"The solution is open source and easy to configure."
"The product is easy to use."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The stability is pretty good, but it could be improved."
"Providing easy configuration for email and SMS notifications, layout and customization of admin and developer landing pages."
"From a product perspective, the first thing is that although the documentation provided by WSO2 is good, it could be much better. We're in the middle of a complex migration, moving away from VMs to Kubernetes with the latest version of WSO2 and good documentation is essential to us right now."
"The professional support and licensing aspects of WSO have been a challenge."
"We found WSO2 API Manager to be a bit complex."
"The user interface needs to improve, it is a bit outdated."
"The interface needs to be modernized and made more user friendly so the product continues to have a growing community of users."
"Lacks some new features and updated functionalities."
webMethods.io Integration is ranked 29th in API Management with 7 reviews while WSO2 API Manager is ranked 8th in API Management with 33 reviews. webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8, while WSO2 API Manager is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WSO2 API Manager writes "Reliable with good capabilities and good support". webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and SSIS, whereas WSO2 API Manager is most compared with Apigee, Kong Gateway Enterprise, Amazon API Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management and Apache APISIX. See our WSO2 API Manager vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.