Microsoft Azure DevOps Reviews

We use the product end-to-end, from project management to CI/CD. We use the tool to create sprints and iterations, track bugs and issues, close down sprints, and have complete CI/CD pipelines end-to-end for all our branch's build releases.

The solution works smoothly. We have been using the tool for our projects since day one. It's easy to move around in the tool. All our projects are 100% on the cloud. Azure DevOps is an end-to-end solution. From project management to CI/CD, everything is connected. It speeds up our development and tracking.

The CI/CD feature is the most valuable for my team's productivity. All the features are helpful. The tool is helpful even in the test cases. We use Azure DevOps because it gives us everything in one product. Source control is useful. The tool enables us to track the projects end-to-end. We can track everything from the requirements stage to the production stage.

Azure Artifacts must be improved. When we do containerization or imaging, it is not friendly with Docker images. It might be because we are using open-source tools. There is no document that explains how to connect to Azure Artifacts when we're building a Docker container. 

The documentation must be straightforward. If we look online, it is very difficult to find or understand. The only way to connect to Azure Artifacts is to create a personal access token. Something doesn’t feel right with having the personal access token in the NuGet.config of our projects. However, it works fine.

I have been using the solution for 10 years.

The product’s stability is good enough.

The product is scalable. We have more than 40 users in our organization.

The setup is straightforward. Using the task and building the pipeline is not an issue. We spent a week trying to find out how to connect to Azure Artifacts. We need a normal .NET Core API and have the Docker file built. We must use a personal access token and keep it in the config files. It is not smooth enough.

The ROI is good enough. Once the system is set, we can focus on the core products.

We pay yearly licenses. The tool could be cheaper.

Microsoft Azure DevOps is the best choice because it is an end-to-end solution. Everything is integrated and trackable from every point. Right from my operations team to developers, everyone gets a clearer picture of everything. Overall, I rate the product a 9 out of 10.

As a software development team, we use Microsoft Azure DevOps extensively across various functions. We rely on its capabilities for source control, enabling us to efficiently manage our codebase and facilitate collaboration. Additionally, we leverage Azure DevOps for test management, including the creation and execution of test cases and test plans. Furthermore, we utilize its features for project planning, tracking work items, and generating weekly documents to ensure smooth progress tracking.

Azure DevOps has been instrumental in facilitating agile project management and collaboration within our team. We extensively utilize all the features offered by Azure DevOps, enabling us to seamlessly handle tasks such as test management, project management, software defect resolution, and source code management throughout the software development cycle.

We are leveraging the capabilities of Azure Repos for our source code management needs, finding them highly advantageous for our workflow.

Azure Pipelines have significantly improved our deployment process by enhancing automation. We utilize Azure Pipelines to standardize our build process, ensuring consistency in our artifacts and maintaining high-quality outputs. Additionally, it has enabled us to enhance our testing procedures, leading to more efficient issue detection and resolution.

Azure Test Plans have significantly influenced the quality of our releases. Acting as our test engine, they have played a crucial role in ensuring the quality of our software. Post-release, all identified defects are thoroughly addressed, and developers are requested to provide corresponding test cases to prevent recurrence of issues.

Azure Port is considered the most valuable feature.

When comparing with Jira, I find that the task management capabilities in Azure DevOps are not yet fully comprehensive and should be enhanced.

We have been using it for three years.

It provides good stability. I would rate it eight out of ten.

I would rate its scalability capabilities seven out of ten. Currently, approximately ten individuals utilize the platform. However, we plan to expand its usage in the future.

The initial setup was fairly complex and time-consuming. I would rate it four out of ten. During the initial setup, we encountered the most difficulty with Microsoft's documentation. It proved to be quite lengthy and lacked clear guidance, which made the setup process challenging. Consequently, we had to explore various additional resources to ensure a smoother setup of Azure DevOps.

For our initial deployment, we allocated one DevOps engineer who dedicated approximately one and a half months to complete the setup.

The cost is quite affordable.

The initialization process may pose some challenges, but I find that the investigation aspect is handled quite effectively. Overall, I believe it's well-suited for both general and specialized DevOps use cases. I would rate it seven out of ten.

Previously, our DevOps operations relied on TFS and Visual Studio systems. However, with the rise of cloud computing, Microsoft introduced Azure DevOps, a comprehensive solution encompassing version control, reporting, requirements management, project management, and automation tools, including testing and release management capabilities. It integrates seamlessly with Azure services, facilitating the development and deployment of applications on the cloud platform. It supports the entire software development lifecycle, from development to deployment. For instance, when developing a project, it assists in the build, test, and release processes, ensuring smooth progression to higher-level environments. 

Additionally, it supports project management activities such as user story management. Its features include repositories for storing code, pipelines for automating processes, and environments for managing deployment configurations. 

The platform has improved our team's productivity in the versioning system within the release management functionality. Each application deployment is assigned its version. When certain features are unavailable or require enhancement in a deployment, Microsoft incorporates these improvements into the subsequent version of the release pipeline. 

They could provide clearer guidance on deployment practices for the product. Currently, two main deployment methods are available: YAML server deployment and release management using pipelines or Terraform. They should offer recommendations on which approach is the best practice for deployment.

We have been using Microsoft Azure DevOps for 5 years.

It is a stable platform. Being a cloud-based solution, it benefits from zone redundancy policies, ensuring continuity even if one server experiences downtime.

We have more than 35 Microsoft Azure DevOps users in our organization.

The initial setup process is easy.

The costs are moderate and justify the value provided. With Azure DevOps, we can easily track your projects, monitor statistics and reports, manage backlogs, and plan deliveries. We can manage larger teams under one platform.

The product documentation contains all the necessary information to get started with the platform and understand its evolving features. Additionally, numerous resources are available on platforms like YouTube, where various vloggers share valuable insights and tutorials on using Azure DevOps effectively.

I rate it an eight.

When I was working at Microsoft, I was one of the core influencers on the feature set and had deployed this solution internally across several organizations. We used it for anything from its CoreALM feature sets to inventory tracking and workflow management and operation support and finance management. There were a bunch of other scenarios. At its core, it is a database with a front end that easily makes it so that you can create new forms and stuff. Then they expose an API, which means you can do a lot of things with it beyond its core use cases.

It becomes a single source of truth for whatever operation is implemented within it. You can have your product definition in there from a requirements management standpoint and then log in bugs and defect management and RPNs and a bunch of other things. You have this single source of truth as they provide an analytics service, and then also easily tie into Power BI. It's really easy to just look at the health and overall operation of your entire business from a single source.

The extensibility of the work item forms and customizations as well as the backend API to query the data, et cetera, and manipulate the data programmatically are all very valuable aspects of the product.

The UI, the user experience, is challenging for newcomers. Once you get it, you get it, and it's not too bad. However, it takes some effort to learn how to work with the system. There's a moderate learning curve. I've used both Jira and Azure DevOps, and I would have that same feedback for both tools.

The biggest challenge has been that both Azure DevOps and Jira tend to pivot more towards software development and the industry is going more towards full end-to-end product development - hardware and software. These platforms could do a lot more to help support the mechanical, electrical, controls, robotics, and more of the hardware side of things.

I started using the solution in 2010. It's been about 12 years. 

I haven't had a problem with stability. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

When you surpass a terabyte of data from a work item standpoint, certainly there are some limitations in performance as the running is querying that large data set in the backend.

I've done multiple different deployments. Sometimes, the smaller, smaller deployments have been a handful of five people, and it might be three software devs, a test engineer, a hardware engineer, and a PM. 

I've also done larger deployments where it's 8,300 people. That was a mix of hardware, software, PMs, firmware engineers, front-end, full-stack devs, mechanical engineers, electrical engineers, et cetera. 

In the deployment that was 8,300, it's actually still deployed there and growing. Another deployment I was a part of that was a medium deployment - 20 users - has since reduced more due to politics and going back to the front-end, ease of use. There are some folks that it was too high of friction to use it. You can scale it up or down to match your needs.

I don't deal with technical support in the traditional sense. I know the developers who've developed it, so I just go talk to them.

I've also used Jira.

I previously used SharePoint and Microsoft decided the direction of SharePoint to be less workflow-oriented and less list-oriented and more as a document store. As their roadmap moved away from work management, I've moved over into the TFS/Azure DevOps world.

I was a Microsoft employee. There was some natural tendency to just go with the Microsoft tool, however, it wasn't a hard, fast requirement when we just looked at the feature sets and stuff. 

I've been a developer on the backend. In terms of setting up the product, my answer would be highly complex. If I were just doing it for a core user, set of users, then I would say the setup was relatively frictionless. I would say the one point of ambiguity is for some newcomers if they don't understand the difference between CMMI templates versus Agile, versus Scrum, they'll find it complex. I've seen a lot of new users create dummy projects to then go in and see how each of those is configured from a template standpoint. Work could be done there to just reduce that level of friction.

In terms of deployment times, I've been on multiple different sides of levels of deployment. From the simple side, I've seen deployments take as little as a couple of minutes. If it's teams of five, for example, they go into the web app, they start up a new project, and boom they're in. They get all the requirements and user stories and all that stuff done. 

I've also been on the other side where it's been nine months with 22 people working full-time to configure and deploy this system across thousands and thousands of users. It just depends on the size.

It's hard to put a number on managing the plan of record. I haven't tried to calculate an ROI. It does what it's supposed to and it's more accessible than an Excel sheet.

The solution costs $5 or $10 per user, per month. It's a nominal fee.

I would actually prefer it in that they give you the first five users for free. That little bit of free users goes a long way, just from an initial trial and adoption standpoint. I would encourage them to keep doing things like that.

If you use the other services - if you use their build and compute engines and stuff like that, they charge some amount for computing and some of their extensions. These are not necessarily Microsoft's extensions. They are third-party ones and they'll charge. Depending on if the feature is core to the product, or it's an extension, it might or might not cost you something extra.

I've evaluated pretty much every ALM.

We're just a customer and an end-user.

I've used all the versions, starting back with Server 2005. Now I'm just using their online version.

In terms of advice I'd give to new users, I'd say it goes back to basic change management. Understand who your attractors and detractors are. Lay out the feature sets, ease of use, and things like that. That at least will help detractors become a neutral party as there are always going to be people that create friction within a deployment. Just have an effective change management plan. I've looked at over 12 different ALMs and they all have their pros and cons. It really just comes down to just picking one and going forward with it and learning it.

I would rate the product at an eight out of ten.

As an architect, I use Azure DevOps for our projects, primarily focusing on setting up CI/CD workflows. We track tasks and maintain timesheets on Azure DevOps. I collaborate with project managers to define deployment pipelines and ensure smooth deployment processes. While Azure DevOps serves as our project management tool, my main role involves architecting deployment strategies and working closely with the project management team to implement them effectively.

Switching to Azure DevOps initially posed challenges, but as our team became familiar with it, we found it greatly improved our daily operations and productivity. Its streamlined processes made our development workflow more efficient.

What I like most about Azure DevOps is how easy it is to manage projects and control deployments. Once configured, team members can manage deployments if they have permissions. Additionally, the reports feature helps generate itemized invoices for the services provided to clients, which is valuable for billing purposes.

One potential enhancement in Azure DevOps could be integrating more customizable reporting features, particularly for Power BI integration, to provide better insights into project data.

I have been working with Azure DevOps for five years.

Azure DevOps is quite stable.

Azure DevOps is scalable and can be used in distributed environments and for different tenants.

Before Azure DevOps, we used various tools like Jira. We decided to switch to Azure DevOps to have all services unified in one place, simplifying management. The main advantage is having everything centralized.

The initial setup process for Azure DevOps was somewhat complex, requiring documentation and technical support. Migration from previous tools and configuring project guidelines were involved. The deployment strategy involved creating directories, and repositories, setting up environments, and assigning access rights, following a predefined plan. Initially, deployment took about three to four hours, but now, for regular deployments, it typically takes 30 minutes to an hour, depending on project stability. 

For the initial deployment of Azure DevOps, gathering information from various resources is essential, but typically, only one person is needed to handle deployment through the web interface. Maintenance involves regular tasks like backups and occasional updates, requiring minimal effort.

The pricing for Azure DevOps may be higher compared to other tools, but overall, I find it reasonable.

In my experience, integrating reporting and analytics into Azure DevOps enhances project visibility and decision-making processes. We can easily generate reports online to track project status and task progress. Additionally, I have integrated Azure DevOps with other tools like SQL Server, enabling us to gather data for generating Power BI reports.

The most beneficial integrations with Azure DevOps are integration with other project management tools for seamless collaboration and APIs for importing data into applications. Additionally, integrating with personal models allows for enhanced analytics and reporting on resource performance and other project metrics.

The source control management features of Azure DevOps, particularly Azure Repos, are highly effective. We can easily track and manage code changes, commit updates, and maintain a complete history of changes for our applications.

I would recommend Azure DevOps to others. Before choosing Azure DevOps, I would advise considering the need for better project management, consolidation of management tools, and streamlining deployment processes.

Overall, I would rate Azure DevOps as an eight out of ten.

We integrate the report pipelines with Azure pipelines, automating the creation of pipelines and initiating deployments automatically. Our process includes continuous integration, deployment, and branching strategies.

The tool's most efficient feature is the integration of its services in one place. It is an easy-to-use product that improves productivity. Microsoft Azure DevOps is also user-friendly. Its documentation is clear and can be found on Google. 

Microsoft Azure DevOps should create some training materials. 

I have been using the product for more than four years. 

Microsoft Azure DevOps is a stable solution. 

The product is scalable. 

I haven't contacted the technical support team yet. 

I rate Microsoft Azure DevOps a nine out of ten. 

We are a team of 12 consultants specializing in this solution. We have customers with approximately 200 users each, and we have been able to reduce our customers' deployment time by using Azure DevOps or TFS.

Additionally, our customers have been able to measure and improve their development process, by generating some KPI's as 'average defect fixing time', 'effort deviation', and 'velocity' among others, due to the continuous use of Azure DevOps.

The integration of the whole cycle is the main strength of the tool. If I want to control the cycle with other tools on the market, I would have to use several tools. However, this is not the case with Azure DevOps or TFS.

The ability to extend work items was more flexible than it is now. Talking version control, one of our customers had some issues because they found it very difficult to manage more than 1000 repositories for one team project.

Additionally, I would like to see more powerful dashboards that could be used instead of Power BI. Azure DevOps or TFS does not support graphics from hierarchy queries. It would be powerful to have because some customers don't have Power BI licenses.

We have been working with Azure DevOps or TFS for the past 11 years.

It is totally stable.

The documentation is good and thus, we have not had to contact technical support very often. However, when we have escalated an issue to technical support, they have been good.

The initial setup can be straightforward if the consultant is knowledgeable.

The pricing is very competitive because of the whole development cycle by Azure DevOps. You don't have to buy and integrate several different tools.

Azure DevOps or TFS is a very good tool for development teams. It's easy to use. However, you would need the help of a consultant who has a lot of experience with the tool. This is because the tool let's you do things in many ways, but not all of them will be the right way to do it. It would be better to invest in the services of an experienced consultant.

Overall, I would rate TFS or Azure DevOps at nine out of ten.

My team uses this solution for the CI/CD deployment, and code check-ins.

We are also using Azure Boards for tracking our work, all of the requirements, the backlogs the sprints, and the release planning.

What I like the most is that it is easy to comprehend, and it's easy to use.

The simplicity is very good and the customer experience is also great.

I am not suggesting this solution should be cheaper. I would like to see a bucket of licenses. for example, 10 licenses or 100 licenses that could be monitored to know how many of those licenses have been used. The price would be deducted accordingly.

I should not have to contact Microsoft daily to request a license or two. There should be a mechanism in place where you are able to find out where you are out of 100 licenses, or that you have used 90 licenses in that year.

I should be given a credit line of 10 licenses at the end of the year or at the end of the month.

It should be easier to manage licenses, especially because it's in the cloud. You should know the usage and based on the usage, you should be able to make decisions.

I have been using Microsoft Azure DevOps for one year.

We are using the latest version.

It's a stable product. I have not experienced any issues.

This is an area that has yet to be explored fully. We haven't taken it to this level.

We are a team of 25 to 30 members, which is fine for us. Every time we scale up we need a new license and that takes time, it's not just a click and it's done.

I don't know if it will be scalable for 200 to 300 people.

Previously, I was working with Jira.

I was not involved in the installation. My team completed it.

Price is an area that could be improved. There are products on the market with a fixed price of 50 or 100 people, you are a bucket price. 

With Azure, you have to pay for every user.

It's good to have a bucket such as 50 to 100, or 100 to 200, and flexible pricing.

The issue may be from having more than one license. When you procure one license or two licenses, it becomes difficult.

It should be easier to procure a license, it should not be one by one. We don't know how many members I will have on my team three months from now.

We plan to continue using this solution.

I would recommend this solution, but I would not know their business needs.

Based on the various features, the deployments, licensing, pricing, and the customer experience, I would rate Microsoft Azure DevOps a seven out of ten.