Tricentis Tosca Reviews

The scanner helps us to define many tests with one scan.

Tests written once can be reused across different projects

I would like to see the availability of more libraries

We have you used this solution for two years.

I did not encounter any issues with stability.

I did not encounter any issues with scalability.

I would rate the level of technical support as average.

We used Soap UI and Selenium (Open source tools). We switched to Tosca because the organization decided to make the switch.

I taught myself how to do the set up, so it was OK.

There are many products on the market. Providing more libraries for the price will be an option that could help.

We evaluated other options before choosing this solution.

It is a good product, with online tutorials, knowledge base, etc.

I liked the "no required scripting" part as most of the people in my team are not skilled QAs and half of the team reside offshore, thus it suited to most of our requirements.

We ended up going back to Selenium as this tool was very slow with the web applications. Also, for any new functionality, it requires customization that in turn required training with no guarantee that it may work with future releases.

They have to create some discussion forum, we cannot always rely on some expert to respond to the queries. Also, everything requires additional costs. They need to have better documentation, forums, and support.

I have used it in one of my smaller projects so as to evaluate if we can use it as an alternative to our Selenium Keyword Driven Framework. I have used it only for two weeks with the 14-day free trial.

The level of technical support is average. I reported that the web application response was very slow and I never really got a real solution. Instead, I sent out too many emails just to explain to them what the problem was.

We have used Selenium WebDriver and still are using the same solution.