We performed a comparison between New Relic and Alluvio Aternity based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Ease of Deployment: New Relic's setup is easy to follow, but may be time-consuming if there are many devices. Alluvio Aternity, on the other hand, is more user-friendly and requires minimal configuration. Aternity's deployment process is relatively quick with the help of one engineer, and maintenance is practically non-existent.
Features: New Relic has a focus on in-depth application information, scalability, and traceability, with synthetic alerts and transparent pricing. Alluvio Aternity, on the other hand, specializes in providing data on machine health and performance, with unique features like DXI for customization and UXI score for measuring user experience.
Pricing: New Relic's cost is a worry for some users due to monthly or yearly licenses and extra charges for added features or data ingestion. Alluvio Aternity's pricing is a mixed bag, with some finding it worthwhile while others believe it to be pricier than other options. However, Aternity's analytics may have a positive effect on IT budgets and increase efficiency.
Service and Support: Despite positive feedback on documentation, New Relic's team has delays when resolving issues. On the other hand, Alluvio Aternity is praised for its highly competent and responsive support, with a dedicated technical team that successfully resolves issues. Assistance is available both locally and overseas.
ROI: New Relic has demonstrated varying levels of success in generating ROI for its users. On the other hand, Alluvio Aternity's ROI is challenging to quantify as it is focused on the expense side of the business.
Comparison Results: New Relic is the preferred solution in this comparison. New Relic offers more versatile features, accurate alert mechanisms, and in-depth application information. Alluvio Aternity provides valuable data on machine health and performance, but lacks detailed performance counters and database monitoring capabilities.
"The data the solution provides is valuable to us; we can see the health of the machines, how they are performing, and what might be causing issues on a particular machine."
"The most valuable feature is the alerting. As soon as we click on an incident, it takes us directly to the problematic PC. It's a direct solution. We click on an alert and it takes us to the incident details. The details show in different colors, in a graphical representation, and I like that the most."
"The detailed level of information you are able to get on the complete environment all of the way down to a specific machine."
"It is a tool that helps me check users' computers really quickly without having a help desk administrator logging in and doing analysis. Anyone who has access to Aternity, including our support team, can log onto Aternity and do a quick, basic analysis."
"We could resolve issues that they had been facing for months or years. They had been having the same issues, the same performance problems, whether it was Excel taking a long time to load, or network instability, or voice call problems, and we would fix it in minutes, in front of them in a meeting, with absolute confidence. It would just blow their minds."
"The dashboard is very effective."
"As a financial institution, we have a lot of applications that are either written internally or bought from a vendor and customized for us. Having a tool that lets us monitor specific transactions in those applications allows us to focus on the transactions that are important to the business."
"The ability to monitor crash and health event issues at a user level"
"The initial setup is straightforward. It is easy to track and easy to follow."
"As New Relic is already integrated with Drupal, we can get our projects done with best practice and with the best value that we believe in."
"It is a one stop shop and integrated with PagerDuty seamlessly. The solution is pretty self-contained."
"One valuable feature is that the synthetic alert stays open until the issue is resolved. You can actually monitor whether your system is back up."
"The most important thing is that it tells us where the latency in throughput and response time are."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to manage the application flow."
"The breakdown of the response time of different components and getting in-depth details of the slow component are the most valuable features. It is easy to use, and it gets the job done."
"It is easier to create new dashboards in the New Relic interface, and it is also easier to query if when I want to monitor a different parameter or time duration on my dashboard."
"Being able to add custom monitoring to dashboards would be nice. Right now, if you want to monitor the value of a registry key on your systems, to get that added into the dashboard you have to reach out to Aternity so they can start looking for that value. It would be interesting if that were more of a self-serve function."
"In terms of a new feature, it would be good if we could restrict a user to a specific application or server. We have several customers, and we have to set up one or two servers for each customer. We have to set up one server for production and one for the test environment. Each user at the customer level can see all applications and the data of all applications, which is not really useful and good. We should be able to restrict user access at the application level or server level."
"When it comes to a lot of the features that I would want, they will tell you they are in their SaaS version, which we don't use... They put all the new features on the SaaS solution and that's where you get the latest and greatest stuff... Why not have those features available for on-prem users?"
"For me, the biggest problem is the price. It is not so much about how much it costs. It is about Aternity only giving you 12 months upfront. So, you got to purchase it for 12 months. A lot of our customers are on a per-user-per-month type billing. They are all OPEX rather than CAPEX. It would be a lot better for our customers if there was an option available for OPEX so that it is billed on a monthly basis than a yearly basis. They've got only Windows agents. They don't actually have mobile agents. It would be a lot better if they could also integrate Android and iOS because then we can start pulling steps and performance management out of users' mobile devices. That's the biggest addition I would suggest at the moment. A lot of our customers have desktops as well as tablets or mobile devices. We should be able to monitor that stuff as well."
"The licensing model doesn't suit the market we are in and has room for improvement."
"The solution is available at a higher price than other solutions."
"I think the workflow needs improvement"
"When it comes to what is called creating signatures, it's not easy for a non-coding person for desktop applications. You need to run the recording and you need to have some exposure and knowledge. That is an area where they can improve. For web applications, they have the Web Activity Creator and that's an awesome and easy tool. Anybody can use it and capture the signatures. With the desktop applications it's a little more cumbersome and difficult."
"New Relic APM could improve error debugging and the correlation with the logs. We are receiving some alerts or alarms but we need to correlate with the error log, but it is difficult if it is more than seven months retention period, it is hard to trace. We need this especially for getting historical information."
"The solution needs to have staging."
"They need to improve the alerting and dashboarding as these are the key features in DevOps."
"The integration and configuration of this product in our AWS environment needs improvement on the filtering part. I would like it to go more granular on accounts."
"I would like to have storage monitoring. E.g., being able to monitor SANS, specifically protocols, like NFS and CIFS metrics."
"It would help customers if there were an on-premises version available."
"They could improve the education process and how people understand that these tools are very technical. Right now, if someone was to pick it up from day one, it is a very steep learning curve."
"We would like to receive more AWS-specific details from the New Relic Dashboard, like EC2 health."
Alluvio Aternity is ranked 21st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 37 reviews while New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 152 reviews. Alluvio Aternity is rated 8.4, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Alluvio Aternity writes "Not only helped us know which devices to refresh, but helped us determine if a refresh was even necessary, with factual data". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". Alluvio Aternity is most compared with Dynatrace, Nexthink, SysTrack, AppDynamics and AppNeta by Broadcom, whereas New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Prometheus. See our Alluvio Aternity vs. New Relic report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Mobile APM vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
