We performed a comparison between Asana and Bitrix24 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has helped our departments maintain visibility."
"Asana has a wonderful user experience that is very easy to interact with and has tons of integrations with other products and tools."
"It's an easy way to communicate."
"I like how easy it is to use the rules within Asana."
"It is stable and easy to set up."
"By using this software, I have adaptability in my work, and it can improve the production of our company."
"It is pretty comprehensive when it comes to the different views that it gives you. It gives you a Gantt chart view, calendar view, board view, and list view. It is kind of helpful to have different types of views and see how it views your different tasks. I appreciate being able to do that. The biggest thing is that it is extremely user friendly. Asana is pretty intuitive. Someone who is not tech-savvy can kind of catch on quickly. It is better than other tools like Smartsheet. Some of the other tools like Microsoft Project and Excel are great tools, but you have to invest a lot of time to learn them, which is not the case with Asana."
"The ability to share projects and tasks among team members appears to be the most valuable feature."
"The technical support was intuitive and had good documentation."
"The CRM and collaboration tools are well-designed for our purposes. Your projects can be based on tasks, CRM, or opportunities. The task-based features are the most valuable for us right now."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its project management functionality...It is a pretty stable solution."
"Initially, Bitrix24 improved the way we operate because we were not previously using a CRM. Before Bitrix24, we tracked everything through Outlook. Now, we have a tool that will automatically put out reports for us."
"Collaboration and CRM are the most valuable features of Bitrix24."
"It is a very scalable solution...The tool currently operates efficiently and contributes to our ongoing digitization efforts, including documentation and workflows."
"It's a very easy-to-use product."
"Bitrix24's workflow is better than that of others. The user interface is also good."
"Some updates are outdated, and their functionalities can affect the end outcomes."
"It's hard to integrate Asana into other parts of the company workflow, so integration is an area for improvement."
"You need to have an action plan, otherwise, it won't be as effective."
"In some instances, there were subtasks where more than one person needed to review it, but I could only assign it to one person. I would have to create a subtask under a subtask and then assign it to other people. This could be improved."
"Auto-shift is an essential feature for planning, but it's currently not there. It should have this feature so that when you move a task that depends on another task, the dates should be auto-shifted. For example, you have two tasks dependent on each other. When the parent task is moved or delayed, the child task should also be delayed, and the date should be shifted. When we have a very long timeline, it's very complex to go task by task and shift the dates on the task. Auto-shift is a fantastic and basic feature of project management, and having such a feature in Asana would make our lives much easier. If Asana added this feature, it would complete the suit and close the project management cycle because currently, there is a gap."
"On the development side for technical project management, Asana is missing features. We only use it for discussing tasks and strategies, and we use it for customer to-do lists. It doesn't have the source code integration that Jira and Jira Service Desk both have."
"The product's page is not user-friendly."
"Currently, there are only a few available options, but it would be helpful to have more control over the notifications received."
"This solution was built using old technology which is now mixed with new technologies. This can make it challenging to get new features live."
"The solution’s performance could be made faster."
"Some functionalities of the tool required specific expertise. For example, the SIP Connector is difficult to install."
"In our organization, we feel that the UI and the functionalities for workflows in the solution need a lot of improvement."
"It's a team management tool, but the way the tasks are assigned and the way you are able to control them are lacking when compared to Asana or monday.com. The latter tools are a lot more adaptable to team management. Thus, better features to control the team are needed in Bitrix24."
"In my opinion, everything needs improvement. It all starts with the user experience. It's extremely difficult to use, it's always lagging, It doesn't look particularly appealing, in terms of how it looks, and it is extremely difficult to locate the stages."
"The support provided by Bitrix24 is an area with shortcomings that needs improvement."
"There are some bugs in the mobile system."
Asana is ranked 3rd in Project Management Software with 43 reviews while Bitrix24 is ranked 12th in Project Management Software with 18 reviews. Asana is rated 8.4, while Bitrix24 is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Asana writes "Stands out with portfolios, easy setup, and real-time information, but needs big improvement when it comes to workflows, automation, and dashboards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitrix24 writes "A project management tool that offers great scalability and stability ". Asana is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, Microsoft Project, Wrike, monday.com and SAP Portfolio and Project Management, whereas Bitrix24 is most compared with Zoho CRM, Microsoft Dynamics CRM, Odoo, ClickUp and HubSpot CRM. See our Asana vs. Bitrix24 report.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.