We compared BMC Remedy and ServiceNow across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: BMC Remedy is commended for its user-friendly interface, valuable features, and impressive dashboards and reports. However, it could benefit from more intuitive dashboards and improved system stability. On the other hand, ServiceNow is highly efficient in workflow management, offers scalability, and provides customization options. Nevertheless, it could enhance the implementation of features and improve its user interface. Both products are considered expensive in terms of pricing and licensing, but ServiceNow is viewed as more reasonable for large organizations. Customer service and support for both products have received mixed feedback, with some finding it helpful and others suggesting room for improvement.
"The most valuable feature of BMC Remedy is to take administrative access of a user."
"The solution helps us manage, escalate, and solve incidents."
"The service management features are beneficial – very good."
"It had automation, orchestration, service level management, and event management. You could also integrate it for auto-remediation."
"It has a good peer sharing module."
"There are a lot of features a customer can use. It’s an existing concept of asset management. One feature is the ability to create tickets for various computer systems, VPN defenses, sites, regions, or customers."
"The solution is extremely user-friendly."
"It includes features for automation, such as smart reporting capabilities."
"The solution is easy to use, simple to make queries, flexible to configure, integrates well, and supports all of our companies needs."
"The most recent addition of SAM Premium is a game changer for many organizations."
"I find the incident management part to be the most valuable. That's how the service desk tracks tickets."
"It is easily configurable and has a good developer society online, available for any issues from the backend."
"We consider the integration capabilities of the solution with other tools to be a valuable feature."
"I don't have to look through a whole bunch of other incidents that aren't relevant to me. It's very useful in that sense."
"Identifies better ways to license software or eliminate unused software to save money."
"The solution's initial setup process is easy."
"BMC works through intermediaries or vendors for support, so you don't always interact with BMC directly. The quality can vary depending on the specific vendor."
"One area that requires improvement is the prevention of duplicates or data inconsistencies in the system."
"If a user isn't using an out-of-the-box configuration, it can get a bit complex."
"I would like to have more customized reporting because the management team loves customized reports with graphs."
"There is room for improvement regarding the customization as it tends to lag in terms of flexibility, particularly in comparison to competitors."
"The upgrade process could be better. It would be a good improvement."
"The solution must be flexible."
"The tool is very old."
"They could improve license management, particularly when integrating different applications or toolsets."
"The solution is lacking in the mobile application area that could be improved."
"The standard UI is very restricted. It doesn't look as good, compared to Remedy. Building your own UI requires some additional coding..."
"The customization that we are doing for the needs of our organization are difficult to do and could be improved."
"We find it good in general. Obviously, there are areas of improvement for every capability. As they evolve more, if they keep on adding more intelligence into the capabilities, it will improve. The improvement areas are more integration across the landscape and more intelligence for the overall capability of the solution."
"One thing I don't care for is the reporting and the way it functions."
"The interface can be a bit more intuitive."
"There should be greater integration with other enterprise applications. We're using Microsoft, Oracle, and other applications, and it would be good to have a greater integration on some of the immediate hiccups that you have with these services. It doesn't mean that when we have a problem with using another application, ServiceNow should be able to fix it, but ServiceNow should be able to alert us to things. There should be a bit more automation or integration."
BMC Remedy is ranked 5th in IT Asset Management with 23 reviews while ServiceNow is ranked 1st in IT Asset Management with 212 reviews. BMC Remedy is rated 8.0, while ServiceNow is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of BMC Remedy writes "Offers automation, orchestration, service level management but lacks AI-based rules ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow writes "A stable and scalable solution that has excellent features and is useful for collecting data and building KPIs". BMC Remedy is most compared with BMC Helix Discovery, Snow License Manager, Qualys VMDR, ManageEngine IT Asset Management and BMC Track-It!, whereas ServiceNow is most compared with BMC Helix ITSM, Microsoft Power Apps, Pega BPM, IBM Maximo and PagerDuty Operations Cloud. See our BMC Remedy vs. ServiceNow report.
See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
www.quora.com
The article linked above helps people select a help desk software based on the parameters suggested.
You can also try Happyfox, an online centralized ticket management software hosted on the cloud. It has light and clear pricing and leanest learning curve. Please check the set-up steps here. www.happyfox.com
Hult Internation Business school is currently using our help desk software. www.happyfox.com
Happyfox does provide special discounts for education institutions and please contact me for more information.
Hi Lawrence, I think you are opensource guy, so you may check it out
OTRS is an Open source Ticket Request System with many features to manage customer telephone calls and e-mails. It is distributed under the GNU AFFERO General Public License (AGPL) and tested on Linux, Solaris, AIX, Windows, FreeBSD, OpenBSD and Mac OS 10.x. Do you receive many e-mails and want to answer them with a team of agents? You're going to love OTRS!
github.com and try below release
www.otrs.com
1. Which software are you using and how do you find the software? Service Now, very useful. Is it easy to use and customizable? Yes. If so, how can we customize it? Forms, fields are easy to setup; business rules – java scripts, api.
2. What software did you use before the one you are currently using and did it offer a way to import existing tickets from your old system to your current one? CA and BMC. We did not import old tickets into the current systems. We imported assets. Change, Incidents, Request start from fresh. Old data was exported and kept as retention.
3. What about/How does licensing costs/work? Only IT roles are payable. As educational institutions face financial pressures, what are the costs and flexible options for payment? Cloud based subscription – based on usage.
4. Is your software on-premise and cloud/hosted/SaAS models? SAAS
5. Are you using any other of their modules/product offerings? If so, which ones? Catalog, Service Desk – incidents, problem, request, Change, Asset, CMDB, Discovery, KB, SDLC
6. What is it about the software that you like? Easy to use What is it that you dislike? Ease of version upgrades are managed but require testing for many hotfixes, some issues are moved to enhancement request within the platform and needs to move to the next version for resolution. Reporting is not as good for trending etc. However, OOB reports can be easily created with existing views. More scripting solutions should be made available to provide greater functionality.
7. What is it that you like about their company and support? Have timezone support with ease of ticket creation. What is it that you dislike? Some problems moved as next release enhancements; manual creation of MIBS / updates for discovery creation of correct models. No able to detect stack switches out of the box
8. Does your software have asset management (desktop, mobile, app and network), a solutions wiki? a help/chat ticketing system? etc. ITAM yes but has not moved onto SAM. Mobile not captured; workstations, servers, applications, business services, network are captured. Service Now discovery is very good as it is agentless but still need to be tweak to ensure proper creation especially on newer equipment and stack switches.
9. Has anybody used Cherwell? ServiceNow? FrontRange? BMC Track-IT? Service Now
Hi Lawrence. I work at Agiloft, and we use our own Service Desk solution. We have several customers successfully using Agiloft for higher education IT service management, including Texas A&M and Cal Poly.
Agiloft is completely customizable with no coding required - all customization is done using an easy drag-and-drop GUI. It's available as both an on-premise solution and SaaS, and includes modules for Asset Management, Customer Support, Integrated Chat, and more, with no additional per-module cost.
You can learn more at www.agiloft.com, or google "Agiloft reviews" to find plenty of thorough, 5-star reviews of our product, including several from our higher education customers. Hope this helps! Good luck!