We performed a comparison between BMC TrueSight Operations Management and Grafana based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Grafana is a flexible, open source solution that is highly valued for its user-friendly interface, customizable graphs, and accurate application metrics. It is also praised for its moderate pricing and a positive return on investment. While both BMC TrueSight Operations Management and Grafana have valuable features, Grafana's good integration and visually appealing graphs make it a popular choice and the preferred solution.
"It is breadth. It covers so many different technologies which can roll up into a single console."
"It provides common administration, and a Single Sign-On Platform with RBAC, which eases the cross launch between multiple tools"
"The solution's event management capabilities are fantastic. We do a best of breed. If, on the network side, they use a different tool, we pull all that data in so that we have a single console. It's kind of like the monitor of monitors. We're able to aggregate all the different types of data sets, whether it's log data, app data, OS data, infrastructure data, or network data. We're able to aggregate all those events and then correlate and be able to say we're having an event."
"Helix Innovation Studio is a very good feature. It allows us to develop our own enterprise applications and make them available for the customers."
"The fact that they have a very integrated relationship with Sentry Software, the Knowledge Module, is valuable... The richest feature for us is the number of Knowledge Modules that we can load into the product to add breadth of service to the customer. It enables us to move up the operational stack from hardware, to operating system, to application, and to cloud... That enables us to provide one pane of glass over all those layers - hardware, OS, app, and cloud."
"The most valuable feature of BMC TrueSight Operations Management is the dashboard presentation server."
"I like the deep-dive detail and end-user metrics data. The synthetic monitor is the best one. The best point of the new one is that there's no need for configuration. You can inject the Java script and start to change major developments in the application. This is a good approach, and we received all the data using this."
"What I like best about BMC TrueSight Operations Management is that it allows you to do granular monitoring and improves VM load."
"Almost any kind of visualization is possible with Grafana and all dashboards are configurable."
"We like the alert features."
"The most valuable thing was that it had a good visualization tool."
"It integrates well with other solutions."
"The most valuable feature of Grafana is the ease to build dashboards from observability construction. Additionally, the page services and integration are good."
"It is easy to change and move virtual servers."
"Grafana's best features are live monitoring and alerts."
"The dashboards are very easy to work with."
"I would really like to see out-of-the-box support for monitoring uninterruptible power supplies."
"More modules for less popular applications and better documentation."
"The dashboard and performance graphs should include a way to automatically schedule and export reports."
"The product must provide application or service monitoring features."
"BMC TrueSight Operations Management could use some enhancements in the application visibility tools."
"I would like them to improve the deep-dive details, tracing, and data agents in this product. We have EUEM, an end-user experience monitoring appliance. This one's quicker than the current one, and reporting side and filtration side are very bad. There are many details we look at and explain what we receive information in the current one, but we cannot have historical data like we do with EUEM. We cannot have a powerful point to look for specific traffic from a specific application and a specific browser. We don't have it in the new one. The current BMC also needs to add the thing that control versions."
"One of the things that the TrueSight environment is missing is some of the HA abilities. The data collection server called the ISM doesn't really have the HA functionality or workload balancing. It was missing from the previous product as well. It's missing redundancy."
"The knowledge modules could be more lightweight in size. At present, the installation packages can be quite large."
"The technical support has room for improvement."
"The solution must provide tutorials and guides."
"Trigger limits are difficult to see in a graph."
"More dashboard is required, out-of-the-box, for OpenNMS."
"The formatting could be better."
"It would be helpful if they simplified the data source."
"The solution has room for improvement with a better API to help automate the construction of the dashboards easier."
"Its UI features to create charts can also be improved. Some features could have a link to the documentation."
More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 17th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 49 reviews while Grafana is ranked 6th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 39 reviews. BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.2, while Grafana is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "The product is reasonably priced, but the solution is a little obsolete because it is deployed on-premise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Grafana writes "Agent-free with great dashboards and an active community". BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, Dynatrace, ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Zabbix and New Relic, whereas Grafana is most compared with New Relic, Azure Monitor, Sentry, Dynatrace and Elastic Observability. See our BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Grafana report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.