We performed a comparison between Check Point Harmony Endpoint and Trend Micro Deep Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)."The setup is pretty simple."
"It is stable and scalable."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"Having all monitoring, response, tracking, and mitigation tools in one dashboard provides our analysts and SOC team with a comprehensive view at a glance."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"We love that we don't have to upgrade it anymore. They take care of that."
"The tool minimizes the impact of a breach with autonomous detection and response."
"The communication with the console is very dynamic and remote, without the need to return to the computer locally."
"The standout features are primarily EDR and MDR."
"The remote support is good."
"Forensic Analysis provides a complete analysis of threats via detailed reports."
"The solution has all the standard features you would expect for endpoint protection."
"We are able to manage all our endpoints from a single cloud console."
"I like the anti-malware features."
"We like the Smart protection and the Virtual patching."
"It helps with virtual patching and IDS fetching."
"There is a degree of set it and forget it in regards to the actual endpoints and what you can do with the console, which is nice."
"The solution has a low footprint and does not have a lot of impact on the host."
"It provides a comprehensive feature set and a strong security baseline for us with integrations into other security tools."
"There are compliance issues for legacy applications and after applying OS security patches. The product's HIPS (Host Intrusion Prevention System) modules do the job for you automatically, without any downtime."
"Deep Security is a good product for managing a few servers."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"The price of the product could be more friendly."
"We know that Check Point has a very good database about threats even Check Point tries to make this EDR stable still there are some issues we were facing after upgrading or taking TAC to help its got resolved but Check Point really needs to work on metadata."
"I have a few issues when attempting to install Harmony on some of the machines."
"Its guides are identical to the existing ones. These guides should be updated and they should improve their design."
"The solutions agent could have better performance, it is a little slow sometimes."
"Check Point users a pattern-based security module, which is something that can be improved."
"The product updates are a manual process for my administrator and can take several hours out of his day."
"Its customer support services and user interface could be improved."
"The workloads must be better."
"Installation and operations may have issues on some machines owing to their configuration of the network cards as the product is a DPI driver."
"Deep Security's reporting functionality could be improved."
"The email relays and proxies could be improved."
"The product isn't very user-friendly."
"When implementing this solution, sometimes we have challenges with SQL migration."
"The solution should focus on the EDR part and probably have an integrated data leak prevention module."
"We'd like to see extended capacity in the on-premises versions."
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is ranked 8th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 103 reviews while Trend Micro Deep Security is ranked 1st in Virtualization Security with 81 reviews. Check Point Harmony Endpoint is rated 8.8, while Trend Micro Deep Security is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Harmony Endpoint writes "Excellent anti-ransomware protection, zero-day phishing protection, and web browsing filtering". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Micro Deep Security writes "Offers excellent endpoint protection and great stability ". Check Point Harmony Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business and SentinelOne Singularity Complete, whereas Trend Micro Deep Security is most compared with Trend Micro Apex One, CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Symantec Endpoint Security and Trellix Endpoint Security.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.