We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."
"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."
"I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user."
"It's easy to configure your set of rules to make the form controls work perfectly, removing manual work and making processes seamless."
"I think that it adds value to any organization, mainly in terms of business applications where you need workflows."
"Our solutions using Nintex has been most successful in automating HR processes because it allows you to easily and rapidly build solutions that conform to the unique business processes for each entity."
"Out of box connectivity with UiPath."
"The solution has helped us to automate our business processes, our approval systems, and automation for quickly developing on SharePoint on-prem and SharePoint online."
"The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role."
"It is quite good."
"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."
"We like Documentum for its capacity and reliability."
"The most valuable feature is that it's a central repository for everything, whether it's videos, documents, Excel sheets, etc."
"The storage of metadata content, workflows, and life cycles are the most valuable features of OpenText Documentum."
"The most valuable feature is the management."
"It has reduced the amount of paper documents; reducing time and errors in the process."
"The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement."
"Heavy, cumbersome and inflexible."
"Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting."
"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."
"The product’s support for the mobile platform and its ability to handle artificial loads could be better."
"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."
"K2 is a workflow solution, and there is no RPA solution with K2. This is where K2 lacks a little bit. It is just a heavy workflow solution. It doesn't have a supplemental product like RPA. If you want to use RPA, you have to use Blue Prism, UIPath, or something else. If you use Nintex, it has an RPA solution. It is a form-based application, and they are doing everything electronically. The initial investment in K2 is heavy because it is a BPM software. It does not have a low cost because they charge you the same for one workflow or 100 workflows."
"The management server and the admin page where you can manage processes need improvement."
"An area that needs to improve is how to reduce storage space on the AWS site."
"It should provide more tools to help clients upgrade solutions based on Webtop."
"We mostly use the Life Sciences package. That package is somewhat dated. There should be enhancements to the Life Science package and additional offerings to support pharma in particular."
"The user interface can be a bit more intuitive."
"The user interface can be improved."
"The main issue is the software's performance when storing around 10 million or more documents. It becomes slow and needs improvement. Perhaps it's a cloud-related issue, but it needs to be addressed. It could be due to our S3 bucket or something else. Nevertheless, this is a significant challenge we're facing."
"In BPM could be better. Its GUI needs the ability to build more rules. This is a crucial feature. For example, OpenText has some products that allow you to control your checks, invoices, and so on. They have exciting approaches to converting pictures to text, but the tool for business process management isn't easy to use. The GIU is not so good."
"The product needs to improve the way documents are logged together. I believe running it on the cloud or containerization will bring value to it. The tool's Time to Market and deployment cycle need to be improved. Finding suitable training materials for OpenText Documentum is also a bottleneck. If we can find the training modules easily, we can bring together people, give them quick training, and start working on the deployment. It can help with quick outputs."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while OpenText Documentum is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Bizagi, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
