We performed a comparison between ThousandEyes and Zabbix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"The installation process is not hard at all."
"The solution's initial setup process was straightforward...In terms of ROI, the solution is worth the money."
"From our perspective, ThousandEyes stands out as an invaluable tool because of its deep and extensive capabilities."
"The solution is very easy to use."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution was the ability to see how the connection quality is between the sites and get an alert if it was turning bad."
"The most valuable feature of ThousandEyes is user-friendliness. It has been essential for us to have a solution that is easy to use."
"The authentication overall - including to the VPN and LAN - is excellent."
"ThousandEyes gives companies better visibility."
"Setup was straightforward. Initial deployment took two or three months."
"The product is very stable."
"The most valuable feature is network traffic monitoring."
"SNMP monitoring, source discovery, and alert triggering are most valuable."
"The calculations part is the most valuable."
"We value the auto-host discovery, template import, bulk import/export features. Newer versions also add nice features, such as multi-IP per host."
"The flexible licensing model is one of the solution's most valuable aspects. It really allows for great flexibility for companies."
"The solution allows for good integration with other products."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"Presently, it lacks the ability to integrate with other Cisco products."
"It might be practical to extend monitoring capabilities to include network devices"
"It's an expensive solution."
"I would like the product to offer more agility."
"There is room for improvement in terms of customization and user-friendliness."
"The guest portal is hard to use."
"They only offer synthetic requests."
"The tool does not provide features for application-level monitoring."
"Sometimes, the documentation is a little bit written in Estonia – a country in Europe. The language barrier and translation to English can sometimes make it difficult to understand what they're trying to get at. It's just a language thing."
"Zabbix isn't very good at automation just yet."
"It should be easy to modify the front end."
"Even though it’s such a powerful monitoring system, it would be more helpful if it had a flexible UI."
"The user interface could be better."
"Zabbix does not draw automatic mapping of the network, this is something they should add in the future. There is a lot of effort that is involved in tailoring some of the settings which could be made easier."
"The networking monitor is not too easy to work with."
"The dashboard and the graph section could be a little bit more professional."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
ThousandEyes is ranked 12th in Network Monitoring Software with 11 reviews while Zabbix is ranked 1st in Network Monitoring Software with 101 reviews. ThousandEyes is rated 8.4, while Zabbix is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ThousandEyes writes "Reliable. simple to set up, and offers fast monitoring capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zabbix writes "Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes". ThousandEyes is most compared with Cisco Secure Network Analytics, Accedian Skylight, SolarWinds NPM, Dynatrace and Catchpoint, whereas Zabbix is most compared with Centreon, Checkmk, Nagios Core, Amazon CloudWatch and SolarWinds NPM. See our ThousandEyes vs. Zabbix report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.