We performed a comparison between ARIS BPA and OpenText ProVision based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The technical support is good."
"ARIS Reporting – Helps download valuable content from the tool in multiple formats."
"ARIS provides the basic foundation for any digital transformation an organization decides to take."
"In general, the users really like it and they can get started using it very easily."
"Objects can be reused across different BPMNs and processes, so we can design new processes quicker and easier."
"MFT is quite attractive. A large amount of data is passed in almost no time and it is quite easy to use."
"Business Process Analysis: We can simulate, optimize, and analyse business processes based on various business requirements. It assures our rolling out the best processes."
"It is a well-featured, functional product."
"The stability of the product is very good."
"All the features come as part of a standard license."
"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."
"The governance mechanism could be better, as could automation."
"ARIS has an internal fully customizable workflow system called APG, which is very good, but it’s targeted mostly at creating workflows related to ARIS content, and not general workflows to support other processes inside a company."
"The tool's installation and configuration part needs to improve."
"Sometimes, ARIS BPA breaks down, and its stability can be improved."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and better designed."
"If you want to create new reports then you have to use JavaScript, or ARIS script as they call it, which is beyond the competencies of most people."
"One thing that could be improved is regarding the handling of the content itself. Maybe ARIS could provide a set of best practices, or best processes, so that people do not have to start from scratch."
"Create simple data uploader."
"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."
"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."
"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."
ARIS BPA is ranked 6th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 64 reviews while OpenText ProVision is ranked 35th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews. ARIS BPA is rated 8.4, while OpenText ProVision is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of ARIS BPA writes "I can usually find an answer to my issue on ARIS Community". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration". ARIS BPA is most compared with SAP Signavio Process Manager, ADONIS, Camunda, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and Bizagi, whereas OpenText ProVision is most compared with Visio, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and SAP Signavio Process Manager. See our ARIS BPA vs. OpenText ProVision report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
