We performed a comparison between Aruba Remote Access Points and Check Point Remote Access VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"The platform has the most valuable advanced filtering feature."
"The product is very flexible. So far the stability of the solution has been good."
"I can use the solution from my home or any remote office to access printers, servers, etc."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is experienced by those working at home since they get a secure Wi-Fi connection."
"This solution is widely adopted and involves both technology and non-technical devices. It is robust, except in cases of significant power outages."
"What I like best about Aruba Remote Access Points is that it's pretty easy to set up."
"Aruba works well in large spaces, especially for manufacturing. That's when you start seeing the effectiveness of Aruba."
"It provides good Spectrum Analysis and troubleshooting."
"It is a scalable solution...The technical support team of the solution is very good."
"It keeps us safe when browsing the internet and when sharing confidential information with our colleagues."
"It is easy to install the Endpoint Remote Access VPN client to different platforms."
"I found the MEP feature the most valuable. This has improved users' latency allowing the users to connect to the nearest Azure Check Point VM."
"The tool is easy to configure and use. We integrated it with Active Directory to manage user authentication. It's intuitive and transparent, making it simple for users to use. It connects automatically to the VPN whenever users turn on the laptop. The product is efficient and offers centralized control."
"To maintain the authorization of the connected user, Check Point provides multi-factor authentication for an RA VPN client to make sure legitimate users have access to resources."
"It offers a simple configuration and setup."
"The team has full visibility of the users that connect allowing them to keep control of who is in the network and what data they are allowing to come in and out."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"It could have better monitoring features."
"The solution is costly for medium-sized companies."
"Our difficulty with Aruba is that the product and the license are two different items. So, if we are adding an access point, we have to pay for two items. We have to pay to add the access point in the controller and we have to pay for the license."
"The product needs an increased level of security for the end user."
"There are some issues, like the VLAN capabilities and support for routing between two VMs."
"I use the controller when using Aruba Remote Access Points, particularly during configuration. Hence, room for improvement in Aruba Remote Access Points is for its web UI to be easier to control."
"The security side of Aruba Remote Access Points could be improved."
"It would help if the remote APs had some kind of SoHo environment with built-in firewall features. That way it could connect directly in a client-to-site type of environment, or a site-to-site VPN environment. That way users could have a complete office setup without coming to the private cloud."
"The cost of maintenance is high compared to most products in the market."
"Price category and smooth renewal of agreement should be considered for flawless and quick onboarding of clients and partners."
"The non-standard setup is quite complex as you have to do changes via GUI and CLI."
"We encounter challenges for the product’s installation and troubleshooting processes compared to other VPN products."
"A characteristic to improve is the communication service under the SMTP scheme."
"Sometimes it causes the consumption of machine resources, and also improves the scanning since they consume many resources in the clients' machines."
"Bug Fixes and enhancement requests should be remediated earlier."
"Improved scalability would allow the solution to handle larger numbers of users and devices without a significant impact on performance."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Aruba Remote Access Points is ranked 13th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 13 reviews while Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 62 reviews. Aruba Remote Access Points is rated 7.8, while Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Aruba Remote Access Points writes "The solution can be used from home or any remote office to access office resources like printers and servers". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". Aruba Remote Access Points is most compared with Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Fortinet FortiClient, OpenVPN Access Server, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks and Zyxel VPN Client, whereas Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Fortinet FortiClient, Check Point Harmony Mobile and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange. See our Aruba Remote Access Points vs. Check Point Remote Access VPN report.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
