We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and Symphony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Social Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The integration's very good. You still have integration with lots of third party products, and it's very good."
"The most beneficial aspect is real-time collaboration, allowing multiple users to work on the same documents simultaneously."
"The most valuable feature of Atlassian Confluence is the ability to access your files from anywhere."
"What I like the most is the Wiki software that comes with Atlassian Confluence."
"Collaboration is most valuable. You can upload or create your documents on Confluence and share them with your team members. Your team members also can share documents."
"The solution is very intuitive and provides excellent content management."
"The solution is stable."
"Atlassian Confluence is flexible and allows adding different types of context on the page and connecting a hypertext, like a web page, without a source."
"Symphony and Laravel are the most comfortable frameworks for any developer. It is also lightweight."
"The solution is user-friendly, and it is very good security-wise."
"The overall functions are good."
"I found the RAM Commander module in Symphony to be the most valuable."
"The entire product is good."
"In the next release, I would like to have the ability to import pictures."
"I would like to see integration with Slack."
"There are some issues with performance when creating tables."
"This is kind of by design, however, the lack of control in terms of editing the page to make it look the way you want it to look is an issue. It would be nice if there was more flexibility there."
"RAM usage seems to be higher than it should be."
"The search function is not great."
"I have a couple of different pipelines that I work with. However, I'd like to see them displayed differently on the same dashboard. So, I would like to have a unified dashboard to view the different pipelines."
"When we have a project that we don't want to share with everybody but want people to know that it exists, there is no way to do this in Confluence. When a project is not shared, people cannot see that it exits."
"The solution needs to improve CI."
"The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved."
"Compared to established vendors, it lacks user flexibility and customization, especially in the PM module."
"To improve the situation, enhancing the functionality for integrating with other applications and addressing ticketing issues is crucial."
"The area that needs to be improved is modular asset management. When we are uploading the assets in bulk, it is not aligned."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Social Software with 99 reviews while Symphony is ranked 9th in Enterprise Social Software with 5 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while Symphony is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symphony writes "Makes tasks like network planning and performance monitoring much easier". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Microsoft OneDrive, Office 365, SharePoint and Zendesk, whereas Symphony is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Slack and Drupal. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. Symphony report.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
