Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Atlassian Logo
2,758 views|1,874 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Atlassian Logo
5,613 views|5,175 comparisons
86% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Atlassian SourceTree and Bitbucket Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Atlassian SourceTree vs. Bitbucket Server Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences.""The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge.""The initial setup is straightforward.""The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."

More Atlassian SourceTree Pros →

"I believe it's user-friendly for our developers, and it's effective in terms of traceability for tracking our actions.""The product is easy to maintain.""Integration of Bitbucket with JIRA & Bamboo is well done by Atlassian.""Its standout features are the seamless integration with various intelligent tools and its user-friendly nature.""Our code is secure.""The product’s most valuable features are private repositories and the ability to work as a proxy for implementing CI/CD pipelines.""Bitbucket Server integrates well with other products.""In terms of benefits, I feel that many companies are moving to Bitbucket Server since it can be deployed on an on-premises model at a time when everything is being moved to the cloud."

More Bitbucket Server Pros →

Cons
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone.""The product's UI needs improvement.""Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer.""For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."

More Atlassian SourceTree Cons →

"It would have been better to use Bitbucket Server if it had something similar to the concept called GitHub Actions since it allows GitHub to provide seamless integration of CI/CD pipelines.""The tasks on Bitbucket must be automatically integrated into Jira.""Bitbucket Server has limited user support for its free version. It is expensive.""The product's initial setup phase is complex.""The solution's user interface could be improved because it's not very user-friendly or intuitive.""Enhancing the real-time reflection of changes online is an area that could benefit from improvement.""Instead of providing only raw features and plugins, Atlassian should provide a ready-to-use integration of both choices to incorporate "trunk-based" development.""At the moment, there are not many details on how to proceed with the troubleshooting if one of the users faces an issue with the product."

More Bitbucket Server Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is a fee for using SourceTree."
  • "Atlassian SourceTree is a free solution."
  • More Atlassian SourceTree Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."
  • "The solution comes as a part of the suite."
  • "We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."
  • "We pay around $6 per user."
  • "Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."
  • "The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."
  • "One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."
  • More Bitbucket Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use Atlassian SourceTree to manage source code from different environments. It helps us merge all the codes by developers.
    Top Answer:I don't see any complexity involved in the product, especially since some of its users are DevOps engineers. My company works less in the area of storing source codes using the product. My company… more »
    Top Answer:I use the solution in my company to store source code and for version control.
    Ranking
    6th
    out of 16 in Version Control
    Views
    2,758
    Comparisons
    1,874
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    146
    Rating
    7.0
    2nd
    out of 16 in Version Control
    Views
    5,613
    Comparisons
    5,175
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    426
    Rating
    8.1
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Stash
    Learn More
    Overview

    Atlassian SourceTree is a graphical user interface (GUI) desktop client that facilitates user interaction with Git repositories. SourceTree provides a visual interface that is easy to use and intuitive. It allows developers to save a lot of command lines when working with Git.

    The tool is free and works as a Git client for Windows and Mac OS. You can visualize and manage your repositories via the simple GUI. The client offers an efficient and consistent development process for Git and Mercurial.

    Atlassian SourceTree Key Features

    • Branch management: Typically, managing branches is a time-consuming and tedious process for project managers and developers. With SourceTree, you can switch working copies with a single click. You can also see where you are compared with the version in the repository, alerting you to push or pull.

    • Working copy: Developers who work using the command line often lack visibility. Access the “working copy” section to see the difference between your local copy and the version in the Git repository. This feature allows you to see exactly what has changed.

    • Branch history: the History section displays the full history of the branch, displaying each commit and file change. This feature enables smooth version control.

    • GitFlow: GitFlow organizes the workflow, streamlining parallel code changes and reducing merge conflicts.

    Atlassian SourceTree Benefits

    • Any level user can use SourceTree: beginners and experts benefit from the visibility and streamlined workflows of SourceTree. Beginners benefit from the simplified version control. Experts can review changesets and stash and pick between branches. Senior programmers can customize changeset and stashes, apply patches, rebase or shelve changesets. The tool offers detailed tutorials to help beginners and experts start quickly. Other benefits for beginners include easy access to commands with one click and simplified distributed version control.

    • Code visibility: the visualization of the Git process enables users to manage large projects with multiple branches and commits. SourceTree automatically tracks the activity of your code. It also features bookmarks where you can see a summarized view of all projects and repositories. Therefore, you can check a specific branch or commit with a single click. Finally, it features detailed branching diagrams that make it easy to follow the process.

    • Git and Hg support: the fully-featured GUI supports Git and Mercurial, offering a consistent development process from the start. You can also use SourceTree for a project on Github. Start by creating the project on Github, then connect it to the SourceTree software.

    • Free: the SourceTree tool is free to use, even for commercial uses, without buying a license.

    • Supports Git LFS: users can track large assets and submit code from a single dashboard.

    • Subordinated modules: you can use submodules for hand-picked dependencies and manage and group projects.

    Atlassian SourceTree Use Cases

    • Check-in and check-out code using the client-side application.
    • You can also use SourceTree to repair broken Git repositories because you can easily detect mistakes at a glance.
    • The simple and intuitive user interface allows users to search for and clone remote repositories.

    Reviews from Real Users

    A Program Manager/Engineer at a government says, "The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge… This product has helped because we have been able to fix problems when our code repository breaks."

    Stash has multiple deployment options to provide the flexibility your organization needs.

    Cloud is a fully hosted service for customers who want to iterate quickly and have us take care of managing the infrastructure.

    For customers who need to run our applications behind their firewall, we have Server and Data Center options. Server delivers greater capacity for a larger user base and gives you more control, allowing you to remain compliant with your enterprise IT, security, IP and privacy policies. For our largest customers, Data Center provides all the capability of our Server option, along with high availability, instant scalability and performance at scale.

    Atlassian also offers premium support and strategic services for enterprise customers. Technical Account Managers are cross-functional technical advisors providing proactive planning and strategic guidance across your organization. Premier Support goes above and beyond our standard offerings to give you account-wide support from a team of senior support engineers.

    Sample Customers
    Facebook, NASA, Cisco, eBay, Redfin, Toyota, Kaiser Permanente, Gilt, CSIRO, Autodesk, The Daily Telegraph, CODE, Illumnia,
    Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government6%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Aerospace/Defense Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise29%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise52%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Atlassian SourceTree vs. Bitbucket Server
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian SourceTree vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 6th in Version Control with 5 reviews while Bitbucket Server is ranked 2nd in Version Control with 21 reviews. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2, while Bitbucket Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitbucket Server writes "An easy to use solution that works as a code repository for developers and helps them merge changes ". Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with Git, GitHub, Bitbucket and AWS CodeCommit, whereas Bitbucket Server is most compared with Bitbucket, AWS CodeCommit and GitHub. See our Atlassian SourceTree vs. Bitbucket Server report.

    See our list of best Version Control vendors.

    We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.