We performed a comparison between Atlassian SourceTree and Bitbucket Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"I believe it's user-friendly for our developers, and it's effective in terms of traceability for tracking our actions."
"The product is easy to maintain."
"Integration of Bitbucket with JIRA & Bamboo is well done by Atlassian."
"Its standout features are the seamless integration with various intelligent tools and its user-friendly nature."
"Our code is secure."
"The product’s most valuable features are private repositories and the ability to work as a proxy for implementing CI/CD pipelines."
"Bitbucket Server integrates well with other products."
"In terms of benefits, I feel that many companies are moving to Bitbucket Server since it can be deployed on an on-premises model at a time when everything is being moved to the cloud."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"It would have been better to use Bitbucket Server if it had something similar to the concept called GitHub Actions since it allows GitHub to provide seamless integration of CI/CD pipelines."
"The tasks on Bitbucket must be automatically integrated into Jira."
"Bitbucket Server has limited user support for its free version. It is expensive."
"The product's initial setup phase is complex."
"The solution's user interface could be improved because it's not very user-friendly or intuitive."
"Enhancing the real-time reflection of changes online is an area that could benefit from improvement."
"Instead of providing only raw features and plugins, Atlassian should provide a ready-to-use integration of both choices to incorporate "trunk-based" development."
"At the moment, there are not many details on how to proceed with the troubleshooting if one of the users faces an issue with the product."
Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 6th in Version Control with 5 reviews while Bitbucket Server is ranked 2nd in Version Control with 21 reviews. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2, while Bitbucket Server is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bitbucket Server writes "An easy to use solution that works as a code repository for developers and helps them merge changes ". Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with Git, GitHub, Bitbucket and AWS CodeCommit, whereas Bitbucket Server is most compared with Bitbucket, AWS CodeCommit and GitHub. See our Atlassian SourceTree vs. Bitbucket Server report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.