We performed a comparison between Atlassian SourceTree and Git based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"Git offers the ability to roll back to the previous version. You can also track all the small changes that you do."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the branch management functionality."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Since I am a very simple user of the tool, its scalability is good for me."
"Version control is beneficial as it allows me to keep track of all the modifications I have made to the applications."
"What I find the most valuable about Git is that it is CLI and GUI-supported. People who do not like using the CLI mode can use the GUI mode."
"I believe it is beneficial to maintain a detailed log or history of who did what to a project and which user committed to the change."
"I like that it's easy to use and because it's accessible from a terminal or a graphical user interface if needed. I also like that we can pass comments from Linux if required."
"The scalability of the solution is good."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"The solution works perfectly fine so far."
"The UI can be more user-friendly."
"In our company, we sometimes feel the need to have certain kinds of reports, but we never get those customized reports in Git's dashboard."
"Git removed the credential feature."
"If the file changes are on the same line, we need to resolve a merge conflict manually. Let's say there is a merge conflict on line 50 because we have multiple commits on the same line number. Git could add some artificial intelligence to resolve the conflict automatically."
"If another person raises a pull request under the same ID assigned to the previous person, and both parties modify the tool, their changes will be grouped together in the same request until it is closed, which is an issue."
"It's not very user-friendly."
"Git can improve the size of the depository it can handle and add the capability to detect the change between common files, such as Excel and PDF documents."
Atlassian SourceTree is ranked 6th in Version Control with 5 reviews while Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 36 reviews. Atlassian SourceTree is rated 7.2, while Git is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Atlassian SourceTree writes "An easy-to-setup solution, but its documentation could be better for technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". Atlassian SourceTree is most compared with Bitbucket, GitHub, Bitbucket Server and AWS CodeCommit, whereas Git is most compared with Canonical Bazaar, IBM Rational ClearCase, Surround SCM, Helix Core and Liquibase. See our Atlassian SourceTree vs. Git report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
