We performed a comparison between Azure Site Recovery and NAKIVO Backup & Replication based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."They're moving a lot of their workload to cloud and aiming for a seamlessly integrated product."
"What I love about Azure Site Recovery is its simplicity for basic configurations."
"Azure Site Recovery allows my company to save around 30 percent of the time on every VM that we need to back up and restore."
"Our primary use case is for disaster recovery and business continuity and disaster recovery (BCDR)."
"It is a very stable product and very scalable."
"The most useful thing is that it provides a snapshot of your environment in about 15 minutes. It is stable, and it always works. It is also scalable and easy to set up."
"We use the solution across hospitality and healthcare domains. We use it for custom development. It helps us develop a seamless omnichannel for the healthcare industry."
"Azure Site Recovery's automated file synchronization was a game-changer in managing legacy systems."
"This enables us to do quick granular file recovery as and when required but also to do whole-site relocation in the case of a total loss scenario."
"Nakivo Backup and Replication's web-based management interface enables intuitive, rapid, and seamless configuration and management of all backup and recovery functionality across the enterprise."
"The updates are problem-free, so we can keep Nakivo up to date on the server and NAS too."
"Most valuable for DimenXional Cloud is the API provided by Nakivo which allows us to implement the software in all types of solutions."
"The product is very scalable, robust, has an easy setup with a short-duration deployment and good technical support."
"The backup and replication are great."
"The implementation of Nakivo made it possible to implement the information security policies currently in force in the company and to meet the statutory requirements in the field of IT security."
"Perfect for someone who doesn't want to waste time."
"The support team took a lot of time to respond and was not very professional."
"I would like to see more security features."
"We need to be able to move the virtual servers and not build and then port them across. They need to improve the hypervisor."
"I conveyed the feedback to the agent, suggesting an increase in the agent count in our VNS in the USA. I also addressed notification concerns, as some issues didn't trigger alerts during a recent call."
"In the newest version of Azure Site Recovery, the configuration was a little more complex, so this is an area for improvement."
"The product's performance is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution needs to improve replication and failover processes. We are still looking for improvements in the cost baseline."
"Site Recovery's scalability could be improved."
"Updating VM Tools on a replicated VM could be better."
"For us, it would be best to improve the speed of the backup instead of adding new features."
"They need a better knowledge base with more information about support issues."
"An additional feature that would be appreciated is disaster recovery automation."
"From an administrator usage perspective, the interface is very intuitive, but maybe the wizard for creating and modifying backup jobs could look a little fancier."
"Updating VM Tools on a replicated VM could be better."
"An improvement would be to include a general data backup solution that is not only for virtual machines."
"Integrations maybe helpful for NAKIVO. I think end-to-end backup and user backup will be useful to have. The price could be reduced as well. I also think that AD integration should be more available."
Azure Site Recovery is ranked 1st in Disaster Recovery as a Service with 19 reviews while NAKIVO Backup & Replication is ranked 5th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 85 reviews. Azure Site Recovery is rated 8.2, while NAKIVO Backup & Replication is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Azure Site Recovery writes "Useful for restoration purposes that ensures that the users get to save a lot of time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NAKIVO Backup & Replication writes "Good deduplication, easy to configure, and offers a free version". Azure Site Recovery is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, VMware SRM and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery, whereas NAKIVO Backup & Replication is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup, Acronis Cyber Protect, Rubrik and Zerto. See our Azure Site Recovery vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
