We performed a comparison between Bitbucket and Git based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Version Control solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The version control feature for our code and the security aspect is valuable to us."
"It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI."
"We use Bitbucket for Jira, Confluence, and Jenkins and we have an automation pipeline. Whenever the coaching is done in Bitbucket we run an automation pipeline from the build, create installations, and tests all in one pipeline. It is done automatically."
"Code check in and code version control."
"The code reviews and the ability to support DevSecOps are very important."
"Bitbucket is a standard git implementation with perfectly coordinated screens, it's secure, and we have had no problems with it."
"Git is Bitbucket's most valuable feature."
"We have a couple of different tools that allow us to tie source code changes to report bugs. It's integrated with a bug tracking system and also integrated with what requires a tracking system. So we have better facilities. We get with the command line and can type all that stuff in and get the same kind of trust, but when we d it all manually, it's not likely to happen."
"What I find the most valuable about Git is that it is CLI and GUI-supported. People who do not like using the CLI mode can use the GUI mode."
"Git is a powerful and mature tool that all software engineers use, whether they use it from the command line with the original version or integrate it with various tools. It helps by promoting collaboration and eliminating problems with code in separate locations. This greatly boosts productivity since you're not lost in a massive local repository, and everything remains organized."
"Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"I like that it's easy to use and because it's accessible from a terminal or a graphical user interface if needed. I also like that we can pass comments from Linux if required."
"You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches."
"The most valuable feature of Git is its ability to track updates, such as firmware documentation. Additionally, many people can make changes to code without problems. It is able to solve conflicts very easily."
"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."
"The implementation is easy."
"Bitbucket should consider having a CI/CD if they don’t have it already."
"We need an improved automation feature for the cloud."
"Currently, what's lacking in Bitbucket is the assignment feature."
"There could be more AI features included in the product."
"I rate Bitbucket five out of 10 for affordability. It isn't cheap."
"I rate the support from Bitbucket a four out of five."
"Bitbucket could improve pipeline building and deployment. Our deployments are not using the Bitbucket. Deployments we are going through Azure DevOps, but the integration is happening in Bitbucket."
"Bitbucket should integrate a static code analyzer."
"The solution could be more user-friendly."
"New developers sometimes find it difficult to call a review or create a request."
"We would like to see tutorials added to the product, for new users to follow so that they can optimize their use of the solution."
"If the file changes are on the same line, we need to resolve a merge conflict manually. Let's say there is a merge conflict on line 50 because we have multiple commits on the same line number. Git could add some artificial intelligence to resolve the conflict automatically."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing model of Git."
"I would rate the initial setup process a four, on a scale from one to 10, with one being the most difficult and 10 being the easiest. The reason for this rating is that once there are conflicts, it takes a lot of effort to resolve them."
"If another person raises a pull request under the same ID assigned to the previous person, and both parties modify the tool, their changes will be grouped together in the same request until it is closed, which is an issue."
"I would like to see an improvement in the way the product owner can review changes."
Bitbucket is ranked 1st in Version Control with 42 reviews while Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 37 reviews. Bitbucket is rated 8.4, while Git is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Bitbucket writes "It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". Bitbucket is most compared with Bitbucket Server, AWS CodeCommit, GitHub and Atlassian SourceTree, whereas Git is most compared with Atlassian SourceTree, Canonical Bazaar, Surround SCM and IBM Rational ClearCase. See our Bitbucket vs. Git report.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
