We performed a comparison between New Relic and BMC TrueSight Operations Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: New Relic offers better network monitoring, longer historical data retention, improved error debugging and log correlation, and better dashboard customization and access management. It also has a simpler user interface, easier setup process, and more straightforward pricing. While BMC TrueSight Operations Management has some valuable features, it needs improvement in several areas, including deeper application monitoring, better cloud monitoring, and more powerful reporting dashboards.
"I like the event management part."
"From an administrative standpoint, what stands out in TrueSight is the ability to implement quickly. When they have a requirement to monitor something, we're able to turn that on quickly in their environment. We're able to set up new apps within a day."
"I like everything about this tool. I recommend this solution to anyone looking for a standalone solution with high availability meaning that can be used depending on the customers requirements."
"BMC TrueSight Operations Management is easily scalable."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The Event Management is outstanding; still is the most interesting part of the product."
"What I like best about BMC TrueSight Operations Management is that it allows you to do granular monitoring and improves VM load."
"The most valuable features of BMC TrueSight Operations Management are the blackouts and event management."
"Sometimes, I monitor the user's time of response and use this information to improve the number of servers on the back-end. Or, I can use it to change my back log for front-end developers and improve their response times. It's very important in this case because I can improve the experience of the final user."
"The product allows the developer to see the actual problems in the applications."
"It has helped us maintain a much higher uptime than we had previously."
"We like the performance of the product."
"The monitoring so far has been good and we are happy with it."
"Their technical support is pretty good and responsive. We have a real good relationship with them."
"The service maps that it creates, the health maps that it creates, the insights that it provides, etc., are all quite useful."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It is easy to track and easy to follow."
"The dashboard and performance graphs should include a way to automatically schedule and export reports."
"BMC's solutions for cloud monitoring (monitoring of AWS and Azure resources) are very poor in stability and customization."
"The graphs are extremely limited. We don't have a lot of dashboard options. To make reports and dashboards more useful, we usually need to integrate some dashboard solutions."
"The one piece that I would love to see is a general-purpose, configurable agent which would be a framework that you can deploy on anything, whether it be Java or anything else. It would allow you to easily deploy it on a platform that they support."
"The product must provide more AI capabilities."
"The knowledge modules could be more lightweight in size. At present, the installation packages can be quite large."
"More modules for less popular applications and better documentation."
"I would like them to improve the deep-dive details, tracing, and data agents in this product. We have EUEM, an end-user experience monitoring appliance. This one's quicker than the current one, and reporting side and filtration side are very bad. There are many details we look at and explain what we receive information in the current one, but we cannot have historical data like we do with EUEM. We cannot have a powerful point to look for specific traffic from a specific application and a specific browser. We don't have it in the new one. The current BMC also needs to add the thing that control versions."
"We have had issues with our agents going offline."
"It is a serious tool and requires a lot of time invested in order to understand how it works."
"I would like a feature where I can turn off alerting at a policy level. Thus, when a policy is inactive, I can shut down all of my alerts within the policy."
"New Relic does enable frontend performance monitoring by default. However, when we are troubleshooting the issue, New Relic is not able to trace back to the service where the issue is. Other solutions, such as Dynatrace are better."
"One thing I'd like to see in any APM, especially New Relic, is the ability to use distributed transactions. When one microservice calls another, it calls another database and microservice. The entire data visualization layer will not be able to correlate from one microservice from end to end and return on that path. Distributed transactions would be a great addition that would make life simpler. Unfortunately, no APM has that end-to-end capability."
"They should bring the pricing down to be more competitive."
"I think that there have been some questionable product enhancements. Over a year ago, New Relic rolled out a new navigation that really disrupted our workflow."
"It gives you amazing statistics, but doesn’t give you enough information about what to do with the statistics."
More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 17th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 49 reviews while New Relic is ranked 3rd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 152 reviews. BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.2, while New Relic is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "The product is reasonably priced, but the solution is a little obsolete because it is deployed on-premise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of New Relic writes "Has a simple user interface and end-to-end monitoring and self-healing features". BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, Dynatrace, ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Zabbix and Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence), whereas New Relic is most compared with Dynatrace, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Grafana and Honeycomb.io. See our BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. New Relic report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors, and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.