We performed a comparison between Bonita and Nintex Process Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a great product that is powerful in developing applications."
"Bonita is simple and lightweight and is flexible to integrate with third-party systems. The UI is now flexible, whereas it was previously rigid. Any technology can be used as a frontend, including ReactJS, Angular, and others."
"The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications. The documentation was useful because it is how I learned how to use it."
"I really enjoy using the workflow management."
"Flexible and drag-and-drop type of UI is very valuable. The integrations are also very good. You can build workflows very quickly, which is my favorite activity. By using the GUI, you can build the entire mechanism, notifications, and all this kind of stuff."
"Development of forms and flows."
"Process automation with Bonita BPM is really easy."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The Vizio-style designer that runs in the browser is, to me, by far the most valuable feature of the solution. It means that the customer doesn’t have to install any client tools to create powerful workflows."
"The solution offers very good integration capabilities. We've never had issues integrating it without solutions."
"The setup is easy."
"The SharePoint feature is a really good connection, there are many features that are good."
"It can scale well."
"The technical support is very good."
"It creates workflows to handle business processes. It allows us to route approvals to users without human intervention."
"It's easy to configure your set of rules to make the form controls work perfectly, removing manual work and making processes seamless."
"Bonita must add a rule engine. We are a 360-degree partner of Bonita. We can integrate with any kind of rule engine. We have a dashboard related to engine performance, but getting a configurable dashboard for the Buildium or transactional data will add value."
"It is missing some important features that other products have."
"We are struggling a bit with integrations."
"There is a considerable learning curve."
"The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve."
"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."
"I would like to improve the product's load balancing."
"I have run into a lot of problems because there is not enough documentation."
"Currently, it's taking quite some time to deploy a package, it needs improvement"
"Converting a document from PDF to MS Word, or vice versa, needs to be improved."
"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."
"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."
"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."
"We are currently facing a lot of issues with Nintex, and we are trying to move away from this solution."
"We'd like to have integration with SharePoint."
"The solution needs more RPA and AI features."
Bonita is ranked 11th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 27 reviews while Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. Bonita is rated 8.2, while Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Bonita writes "A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". Bonita is most compared with Camunda, Bizagi, Apache Airflow, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Bizagi. See our Bonita vs. Nintex Process Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
