We performed a comparison between Bosch inubit and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."We contact their customer support often. They are very good and reliable."
"The most valuable feature is that you can customize it completely with all of the attributes that you need."
"It is a stable solution."
"I would say the collaboration features are very useful to us, because we are a European organization, so we are not in one location. This is an easy way to share with other people and ask them for feedback. That is the use case for us."
"I like the collaboration and the real-time aspects of it."
"The ability to leave comments in the Collaboration Hub is a good and easy way for the employees to give feedback on the processes."
"The Signavio tool is very easy to use and it is one of the reasons why I like it."
"I use SAP Signavio Process Manager to model processes to the former operating model."
"The most valuable feature for me is usability."
"There are better solutions on the market. To make it a perfect ten, they should improve the price. There is a learning curve and sometimes there are issues from the software."
"I would like to see more integration with the process manager in terms of the workflow accelerator."
"We would like a better way to give users the correct permissions for processes, whether to view or design."
"Typically, a business process management suite would cover the whole lifecycle, from discovery to optimization and operations. This is running on the process server and providing some kind of low-code environment for developing business solutions. I think the latter part is missing, where SAP Connector comes in. Specifically, the execution of processes is missing, where you would design forms to take orders. This is typically part of some development environment for the process server to run processes from out of the models."
"SAP Signavio Process Manager's UI is not user-friendly. Its pricing is also high."
"Technical support has been somewhat challenging; there hasn't been much visibility on how to create a ticket or integrate with SAP."
"One of the most important points in Signavio that would be a great change would be the management of variants of the process."
"The performance metrics appearing in the collaboration hub needs to be improved."
"It could be more flexible from a customization point of view, where the user is able to display only whatever he needs."
Earn 20 points
Bosch inubit is ranked 42nd in Business Process Management (BPM) while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 58 reviews. Bosch inubit is rated 8.0, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Bosch inubit writes "First Look – Bosch Software Innovations inubit Suite 6". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Bosch inubit is most compared with IBM BPM and Camunda, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
