We performed a comparison between Camunda and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Design solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ease with which I can define workflows is most valuable. The latest updates and flexibility that it provides around a task activity are interesting for me."
"The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN."
"Camunda's process diagram creation and deployment is very easy."
"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."
"Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers."
"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."
"The interface and the number of connectors that they provide are the most valuable features. The support here, it's kind of okay. But the main thing is with the number of connectors and the UI, the user interface."
"The Camunda BPMN Platform is very flexible and gives several options to deploy and scale it."
"There are many valuable features, of course. I would say the main value of Signavio is to have your current process map in a way that is easy to read and derive optimization actions to make it leaner, faster, more user friendly, etc. Another great feature is the visualization, which is easy to see and read. How they map the process is also very user friendly, with drag-and-drop functionality. Also, it's a very self-explanatory, user-friendly solution."
"It is highly user-friendly and easy to use, even for those who are not familiar with product modeling."
"The drag-and-drop functionality in Signavio is impressive and user-friendly, allowing easy connection to other elements without the need for excessive back-and-forth."
"It is a stable solution."
"In my opinion, the most valuable feature is the editor and its ease of use, and when people are looking at it, they can make comments about changes that need to be made."
"The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand because it's visually presented. It becomes easy to explain variants and what needs to change."
"I would say the collaboration features are very useful to us, because we are a European organization, so we are not in one location. This is an easy way to share with other people and ask them for feedback. That is the use case for us."
"One of the most valuable features is ease of use which has really been a good thing to put into the business. People like tools that they can just pick up and use straight-away."
"Initial setup can be quite complex."
"I would also like a very easy to use form builder."
"The initial setup can be complex for business users."
"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."
"I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java."
"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"The latency of API could be decreased."
"I would like to be able to include images in the documentation."
"I think the interface itself can improve a bit. I think the interface is still stuck about a decade in the past, if I may be so brutal about it. Some of the buttons are really small, so you can't even see them. I think it needs upgrading to the 21st century with apps and the way we use mobile phones."
"The solution is complex."
"Customized reporting can be improved to make this a more versatile tool."
"If you start from scratch then I think this product would be ideal, but if you already have something then it may or may not suit you."
"There are a few bugs when you use the Microsoft Surface Hub with the big screen."
"For us, it would help a lot if this solution had floating licenses."
"It is sometimes difficult to find the match between what is possible and what is wanted, or what is helpful with the product, so better documentation may assist in this regard."
Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 69 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 6th in Business Process Design with 57 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and ServiceNow Orchestration, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Visio, ADONIS and UiPath Process Mining. See our Camunda vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
