We performed a comparison between Camunda and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Software AG and others in Business Process Design."The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."
"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"For an internal project, this is a solution that you can install and have up and running quite quickly."
"We can easily define and deploy business processes. Camunda provides the tools that allow business people to design business processes. We don't have to have developers for it. It is so easy to use that our business people can go into the tool and model their business processes. We get time to do other things than just designing business processes."
"Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."
"The solution is good for data models."
"The graphical interface is very beneficial."
"Camunda is a scalable product."
"The most valuable feature is the management."
"The storage of metadata content, workflows, and life cycles are the most valuable features of OpenText Documentum."
"We like Documentum for its capacity and reliability."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the security, storage, and document search capability."
"The stability is very good."
"The product is tamper-proof and enables us to return to the document source, which is helpful in legal issues."
"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."
"The most valuable feature of Documentum for our content management needs is its ability to segregate access based on department and role."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"I don't like the UI of the Camunda Platform, I have found the Signavio solution to be much better for me to create the process designs and execute them. Additionally, I have found the tools in the Camunda Platform are not compatible with some of my other tools. They should improve this in the future."
"The product must provide more videos and training materials."
"The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself."
"Camunda Platform's customer support could be improved because their response is quite slow."
"If they could build some scripts or some configuration to get it up and running in a Docker environment, that would be good. I didn't find anything when on Docker, however, maybe they have something and I didn't see it yet."
"Customization and tech stack could be up-to-date."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"Sometimes DocBroker cannot see the DocBase."
"It needs a better UI and it should also be cloud-ready. The UI has not changed in years."
"The user interface can be improved."
"I would like to see performance improvements, especially regarding slow response times."
"OpenText Documentum is moving to the cloud, and I am concerned about the security aspect of it."
"The product needs to improve the way documents are logged together. I believe running it on the cloud or containerization will bring value to it. The tool's Time to Market and deployment cycle need to be improved. Finding suitable training materials for OpenText Documentum is also a bottleneck. If we can find the training modules easily, we can bring together people, give them quick training, and start working on the deployment. It can help with quick outputs."
"One area for improvement in OpenText Documentum is its handling of outdated documents, especially technical ones."
"In BPM could be better. Its GUI needs the ability to build more rules. This is a crucial feature. For example, OpenText has some products that allow you to control your checks, invoices, and so on. They have exciting approaches to converting pictures to text, but the tool for business process management isn't easy to use. The GIU is not so good."
Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 71 reviews while OpenText Documentum is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with SharePoint, OpenText Extended ECM, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
