We performed a comparison between Cisco TelePresence and Webex based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Cisco TelePresence are the basic standard features and the ease of use. Additionally, the configuration and integration are exemplary."
"The configuration is a valuable."
"It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"The SpeakerTrack feature is the most valuable feature."
"The speaker tracker feature in Cisco Telepresence is highly valuable, especially the ability to track multiple participants and change focus during meetings."
"We have a dual screen option to enable video and content sharing."
"TelePresence allows our customers to have a quick meeting while traveling and still be effective. It saves time and money."
"PresenterTrack cameras improve the meeting experience."
"The product's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with multiple products."
"Webex helps us collaborate better. We can work with customers and our team in real-time, share screens, and use a whiteboard. It's been really helpful."
"Seamless integration with Microsoft Outlook."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Webex has frequent updates and it is very good."
"The transcripts from Webex calls get delivered to the inbox five minutes after the call. However, out of 20 people on a call, maybe only one person bothers to read through the entire transcript, which can be lengthy for an hour-long call."
"I have found Webex to be stable."
"The tool simplifies our work by allowing us to have hybrid meetings instead of always meeting in person, which saves time in organizing these meetings. It also offers good video quality."
"The tool is expensive."
"MX800 comes only with one available DVI port. A few more HDMI ports will improve the system's capability."
"The calling features can be improved."
"Cisco TelePresence could improve its integration capabilities."
"The price of Cisco TelePresence overall should be reduced."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. It was complex with badges and certificates. Too crazy."
"I was in touch with one of our clients and they mentioned that they would like to have a holographic video conferencing. It would be great if that feature would be added."
"They should work to make it simpler."
"The interface could be a bit more user-friendly."
"To make Webex more competitive, I would suggest lowering the price and providing some of the same features that are in Teams or Zoom."
"The pricing could be improved."
"This service could be improved by implementing integration with Microsoft platforms. If you are on a call with Webex, you can get a call from Teams or Skype for Business without receiving any indication."
"There are too many issues with getting people connected to meetings."
"The scalability and voice quality attached to the solution are areas of concern where improvements are required."
"There could be a feature available to record the meetings."
Cisco TelePresence is ranked 7th in Virtual Meetings with 8 reviews while Webex is ranked 2nd in Virtual Meetings with 121 reviews. Cisco TelePresence is rated 8.2, while Webex is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco TelePresence writes "It's our go-to solution for demonstrating our services to clients". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Webex writes "Used to conduct online third-party client meetings or third-party vendor meetings". Cisco TelePresence is most compared with Zoom, Polycom RealPresence Clariti and Cisco Meeting Server, whereas Webex is most compared with Cisco Meeting Server, Skype for Business, TeamViewer, Zoom and Huawei Video Conferencing Platform. See our Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex report.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
