We performed a comparison between Datadog and OpenText Business Process Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It helps us better manage our logs."
"Datadog agents act as an integration to different services, providing easy access and management."
"Datadog has proven to be easy to set up and legible for both development and operational teams."
"The flexibility to create notebooks and dashboards and fully customize them gives us a lot of power to track the exact services and endpoints we are working on."
"We can handle debugging and find out why things are breaking in our applications."
"It is a good one stop location where we keep all our data for our infrastructure, and it's also easier to navigate between different things."
"We have hundreds of microservices, and knowing how top-level requests weave throughout all of them is invaluable."
"We've been able to glean from the monitors what servers are down, and can alert the team in Slack."
"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."
"The stability has been very good over the years."
"Delta traces on the Golang profiler are extremely expensive concerning memory utilization."
"Datadog needs more local Asia-Pacific support, and if they don't have a SaaS solution in Asia-Pacific, they should offer an on-prem version. I'm told that's not possible."
"Datadog is so feature-rich that it is often hard to onboard new folks and tough to decide where to invest time."
"I'm not sure if Datadog can monitor K8s deployments in real-time. For instance, being able to see a deployment step by step visually. This would be helpful if there were any incidents during the deployment."
"We need more integration functionality, including certain metrics integration."
"We have asked technical support questions, and sometimes they don't get back to us right away. Or when they do, it is not the right answer."
"Their security features could be improved. We looked at their Security Monitoring feature but it was early in its development. Datadog are just getting into the security space so I'm sure this will improve in the future."
"The solution should provide alerts for cloud outages."
"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."
"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."
Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is ranked 58th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Datadog is rated 8.6, while OpenText Business Process Monitoring is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Business Process Monitoring writes "Stable with good performance visibility but is a discontinued product". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability, whereas OpenText Business Process Monitoring is most compared with Dynatrace and AppDynamics. See our Datadog vs. OpenText Business Process Monitoring report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.