"The most valuable feature of Entrust GetAccess is its performance."
"The most valuable feature is that it meets the requirements of the customer. You have a lot of features in the product. Every product has them, but the question is, are these products going to meet the requirement of the customer?"
"It's agent-based. It's convenient to deploy and integrate."
"It provides the breadth and the width to provide solutions for the different kinds of technologies which we have."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with the Active Directory."
"Right now, federation that comes out-of-the-box with single sign-on is the most valuable feature that we have, and also scalability."
"It has considerably reduced the amount of time that new users would take to join into the organization. Previously, it was a lengthy, manual process because it's a very secure environment, where they need to verify the user before they can actually grant him a user-ID and password. Integrating with the built-in custom application, and exposing CA Single Sign On to the internet, we were able to get the employees onboard. The time that we gained was: previously it would generally take from four to eight weeks for each employee, we brought it to one to two days."
"The Directory is secure. It's our user store, and it's important to keep our members safe. The product does well with that."
"The single sign-on is the solution's most valuable feature"
"Entrust GetAccess is a very expensive solution, and its pricing could be improved."
"The tech support has not been very good for us so we don't use them anymore. We have had some issues. Nobody is perfect."
"In future releases, I would like to see maybe more capabilities with some more modern authentication."
"The technical support could be better."
"If the reporting feature can be integrated into SSO itself that will be an icing on the cake."
"To add more value to this solution it needs to be more user-friendly."
"The GUIs are not very clear, especially when integrating with other products from CA."
"CA has reporting at the moment. With the reporting, every particular segmented product has a reporting engine. I would like to see centralized reporting for all of them together."
"All the problems that we reported actually have never been resolved. We could not capture enough information for CA to be able to debug the problem."
Entrust GetAccess is ranked 1st in Web Access Management with 1 review while Symantec Siteminder is ranked 2nd in Web Access Management with 69 reviews. Entrust GetAccess is rated 10.0, while Symantec Siteminder is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Entrust GetAccess writes "A scalable solution that can be used for hardware-based authentication". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symantec Siteminder writes "Easy to implement and customize and very stable". Entrust GetAccess is most compared with , whereas Symantec Siteminder is most compared with PingFederate, ForgeRock, Okta Workforce Identity, PingAccess and PingID.
See our list of best Web Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Web Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
