We performed a comparison between F5 BIG-IQ and ServiceNow Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We use this solution on a daily basis, and it is very stable."
"F5 BIG-IQ has always provided us with great support."
"The reporting feature is quite good."
"F5 BIG-IQ is a central management system for the BIG-IP."
"F5 BIG-IQ reduces the propensity for error."
"The backup, monitoring and logging are the best features."
"The GUI is fine, at least from an engineer's perspective."
"The most valuable features are load balancing and WAF."
"This is a user-friendly solution where scripts can be made with ease. There are also many integration options, including Microsoft products, which gives the product a competitive edge."
"Great with IT processes and business processes."
"The solution effectively automates business processes."
"The data visualization is good."
"The interface of the solution is very user friendly and it is easily accessible via a simple URL. This makes it easier to complete the UI based tasks but using other features require expertise in languages like Java. But along with that, there are limitation in terms of network connectivity testing and administrator faces regular challenges in conducting connectivity tests due to these limitations."
"It's probably the best product out there."
"There are a lot of ready to use orchestration custom packs."
"The product has a flexible interface for development."
"Integration with VAS is something that they need to work on."
"The solution's rSeries has been made free, and iSeries should be made free as well."
"F5 BIG-IQ is a complex solution, and it cannot manage everything related to BIG-IPs."
"They could use YAML or JSON if they wanted to make it a little bit easier for us."
"F5 BIG-IQ should improve by being a complete certificate management solution because currently, it is only for Venafi. Other automation platforms, should be added."
"Sometimes the solution does not work."
"I had trouble with high availability deployment in my environment."
"The solution should improve pricing. It's expensive in comparison to other American solutions."
"ServiceNow Orchestration needs to improve multiple aspects in which their event monitoring system is one. The solution lacks event monitoring systems which makes them non-competitive. They need to include improvements in a similar manner that they did in Sweden."
"There should be connectors to cover at least the top industry applications, and they should be easier to configure in a plug-and-play fashion."
"The deployment requires awareness among the project staff."
"From my space, the only thing that I can say is the spinning up with Google Cloud Services."
"We cannot perform GUI automation using the tool."
"Efficiency of some features could be improved."
"There can be gaps in integration."
"The automatic remediation needs enhancement, particularly integrating ServiceNow with tools like SolarWinds and Logic Monitor. It is functional, but it needs improvement."
F5 BIG-IQ is ranked 23rd in Process Automation with 12 reviews while ServiceNow Orchestration is ranked 13th in Process Automation with 12 reviews. F5 BIG-IQ is rated 7.4, while ServiceNow Orchestration is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of F5 BIG-IQ writes "A central management system to manage and monitor a bunch of different BIG-IP devices". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Orchestration writes "Fastest upgrading technology in the market currently". F5 BIG-IQ is most compared with , whereas ServiceNow Orchestration is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Control-M, Nintex Process Platform and OpenText Operations Orchestration. See our F5 BIG-IQ vs. ServiceNow Orchestration report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
