We performed a comparison between ForgeRock and Microsoft Entra ID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Identity Management (IM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The most valuable feature of Omada is its API connectivity, which allows seamless integration with various services like SAP, GRC, and Microsoft licenses."
"Omada's user interface is elegant and easy to work with. I like Omada's ability to automatically generate accounts for new hires and allow them access to all required systems by established policies. Around 80 percent of workers can start working immediately on their first day without requesting further access."
"For me, the best feature of Omada Identity is its web interface because it's really easy for users to understand."
"The best feature in Omada Identity is that it enables us to implement standardized employee life cycle processes so that we don't have to create them ourselves. We can then use the standard workflows. The breadth and scope of the solution’s IGA features also fulfill our requirements."
"The key benefit of Omada Identity is maintaining complete control."
"The most relevant feature is Omada's reporting engine. Omada never 'forgets' and archives every process. All steps an admin, user, or manager has executed, are recorded in Omada."
"Omada's most valuable aspect is its usability."
"What I like most is that we can always find a solution, and we can also find the cause when something goes wrong. I like that the most because everything is in one way or another traceable. That is what I like most. I like its reliability."
"The solution integrates well and it is important for them to keep up with the current trends in the market quickly enough, and they have been doing a good job at it."
"The solution is very scalable. We have a lot of users that have been increasing over the years that we have been using it. We have approximately 20,000 users."
"ForgeRock products are customizable, and the out-of-the-box features are solid, too. I primarily use the OIDC compliance features. It's just a configuration. it's easy to set up and customize trees. We can add our own features if necessary. Banks and corporations have different standards and specific validations."
"We have found the identity and access management tools in the solution to be particularly useful for our organization."
"We used it to implement multi-factor authentication and to improve our security posture as well as reducing the potential for attacks."
"The support is good and prompt."
"I like the way it is handling authentication and authorization."
"The most valuable features are that it is easy to manage and it's stable."
"The solution offers business to business and client to business support."
"I would say that Azure AD's pricing is very reasonable because of the structure and in terms of the solution."
"The visibility and control for permission management are excellent."
"Its ability to provide secure connections to people at all locations is the most valuable. It is mostly used by enterprises."
"The self-password reset if it's enabled and configured properly, really helps a company be able to reset rather than getting IT involved."
"The best feature is the single sign-on provision for the various type of users."
"The single sign-on of the solution is the most valuable aspect."
"The most valuable features of this solution are definitely the authorization and authentication, and the rule-based user validation."
"Omada could make it a bit more convenient to send emails based on events automatically. Having that functionality is critical for us to maintain transparency."
"What I would most like to see added to the product is role management, especially enterprise or business role management, and the processes around that."
"The solution should be made more agile for customers to own or configure."
"We are still on Omada on-prem, but I understand that when Omada is in the cloud, you cannot send an attachment via email. We have some emails with attachments for new employees because we have to explain to them how to register and do their multi-factor authentication. All that information is in the attachment. People have to do that before they are in our system. We cannot give them a link to our Intranet and SharePoint because they do not yet have access. They have to register before that, so I need to send the attachments, but this functionality is not there in the cloud."
"Omada's reporting functionality is limited and could benefit from greater customization."
"I would like to search on date fields, which is not possible now."
"The reporting on the warehouse data and the import process both have room for improvement."
"Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is common for most of the products we evaluated. Its scalability should be better. It had a few scalability issues."
"The solution's documentation is not very good, and they do not give more details."
"The solution requires more simplified customization. However, part of the problem is my clients determining their own preferences. Technology can help and do many things, but you have to define your own policies to ensure that the solution or service works within those parameters. Helping customers understand their business and different processes is another issue not relating to the functionality of this solution."
"Lacks simplified documentation within the tool that requires use of a separate portal."
"The user interface could be improved as it is cumbersome and outdated. It doesn't have a responsive UI."
"We're worried about the scaling. We're told it will be okay and there won't be issues, however, I'm not 100% convinced."
"The only problem with ForgeRock is that it is derived from an open-source product, so sometimes it's a bit unstable."
"We would like this solution to be developed for use with mobile applications."
"It should have a better user interface. Its flexibility should also be improved. It is not about simplifying; it is more about flexibility. Each company has its own requirements, and ForgeRock can provide more flexibility in terms of the use of existing modules to implement features for the customers."
"Microsoft needs to make improvements in this regard and extend its services to other operating systems as well, especially when considering their widespread usage."
"Some of the features that they offer, e.g., customized emails, are not available with B2C. You are stuck with whatever email template they give you, and it is not the best user experience. For B2C, that is a bit of a negative thing."
"I think the documentation and configuration are both areas that need improvement."
"There are some features, where if you want to access them, then you need to make use of PowerShell. If someone is not really versed in PowerShell scripting, then they would definitely have issues using some of those features in Azure Active Directory."
"The documentation could be better."
"Lacks integration between applications and phones."
"The solution could be cheaper."
"The dashboard and interface could be better. It would be ideal if it was easier to use."
ForgeRock is ranked 6th in Identity Management (IM) with 27 reviews while Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 1st in Identity Management (IM) with 190 reviews. ForgeRock is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ForgeRock writes "Governance and access management solution used for multi-factor authentication that is outdated with an unresponsive UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Saves us time and money and features Conditional Access policies, SSPR, and MFA". ForgeRock is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, PingID, Auth0, Symantec Siteminder and Saviynt, whereas Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Google Cloud Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Okta Workforce Identity and Cisco Duo. See our ForgeRock vs. Microsoft Entra ID report.
See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors and best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
