We performed a comparison between ForgeRock and Microsoft Entra Permissions Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Ping Identity and others in Access Management."Easy to navigate, handle and manage the applications."
"The most valuable features are that it is easy to manage and it's stable."
"The most valuable features of ForgeRock are social login and data protection."
"ForgeRock has CIAM, which other products didn't have, and they have DevOps ready."
"The support is good and prompt."
"We used it to implement multi-factor authentication and to improve our security posture as well as reducing the potential for attacks."
"We have found the identity and access management tools in the solution to be particularly useful for our organization."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the authentication for the consumers. The integration with other third-party applications is excellent."
"Multifactor authentication is valuable."
"In an upcoming release, the solution could improve by limiting the need to do customizations."
"It should have a better user interface. Its flexibility should also be improved. It is not about simplifying; it is more about flexibility. Each company has its own requirements, and ForgeRock can provide more flexibility in terms of the use of existing modules to implement features for the customers."
"The product's support services in the French language are not free."
"They should improve the solution by include reporting."
"The solution requires more simplified customization. However, part of the problem is my clients determining their own preferences. Technology can help and do many things, but you have to define your own policies to ensure that the solution or service works within those parameters. Helping customers understand their business and different processes is another issue not relating to the functionality of this solution."
"I find that it's quite expensive for just an open-source system. Support is quite expensive."
"It should be a little bit easier to implement. It is user-friendly, but there is always scope for improvement."
"We raised tickets asking for improvements, but sometimes we don't get the proper solution. They are responding, but the ticket is open for weeks and weeks. For some issues, we don't get a satisfactory solution or the solution doesn't work."
"We use a third-party API called Nebula API to integrate the account for authorization. The time-bound access area in Entra can be a problem. It can be improved in terms of the granularity of the permissions."
More Microsoft Entra Permissions Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
ForgeRock is ranked 5th in Access Management with 27 reviews while Microsoft Entra Permissions Management is ranked 2nd in Cloud Infrastructure Entitlement Management (CIEM) with 1 review. ForgeRock is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Entra Permissions Management is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of ForgeRock writes "Governance and access management solution used for multi-factor authentication that is outdated with an unresponsive UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Entra Permissions Management writes "Provides resource-based access and security, but time-bound access can be a problem". ForgeRock is most compared with SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Ping Identity Platform, Microsoft Entra ID, Auth0 and Symantec Siteminder, whereas Microsoft Entra Permissions Management is most compared with SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Microsoft Identity Manager, Saviynt, Microsoft Defender for Cloud and Microsoft Purview Data Governance.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.