We performed a comparison between ForgeRock and Okta Customer Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is a stable solution. When you do experience any issues, you will see it in your DB logs or audit logs so you can easily reach a conclusion of might be causing it."
"The most valuable features are that it is easy to manage and it's stable."
"The support is good and prompt."
"Even though we have very small business interests with them today, they see that we plan on growing drastically over the next two years. Therefore, we have excellent support and we are now at a point where we are not calling tech support. We pick up a phone and call the Account Manager and they'll get everything resolved for us. We don't have to queue along with everybody else and go through a long process."
"Their access management solution, OpenAM, is most valuable because it meets the needs of a lot of users."
"The most valuable features of ForgeRock are social login and data protection."
"Easy to navigate, handle and manage the applications."
"Installation and configuration are pretty easy for ForgeRock OpenIDM."
"The most valuable features of Okta Customer Identity are there is no infrastructure cost, integrated, has plenty of documentation, and is user-friendly."
"We primarily use it to manage the community onboarding and offboarding of users, and it's quite a simple solution for that."
"The most valuable feature of Okta Customer Identity is its SSO because it's very easy to use and it's user-friendly. Even the admin portal of the solution is very user-friendly, and you can walk through it with ease. Okta Customer Identity is not a complicated solution, and even the workflow automation feature is very, very easy to understand."
"The end user's ease of use is the most valuable feature."
"It is very seamless."
"As far as our security team is concerned, the ease of implementing multifactor authentication is definitely the biggest value for our organization."
"I think all the functions of the solution are vital and important because life cycle management is important for some companies. The Single Sign-On feature is fantastic for different customers and advanced server access is really good for access to the servers."
"We can integrate two-factor authentication with the applications."
"I find that it's quite expensive for just an open-source system. Support is quite expensive."
"The only problem with ForgeRock is that it is derived from an open-source product, so sometimes it's a bit unstable."
"We're worried about the scaling. We're told it will be okay and there won't be issues, however, I'm not 100% convinced."
"The solution's deployment should be made easier."
"I think the upgrade process is sometimes a little complicated and there are failures that occur."
"The solution requires more simplified customization. However, part of the problem is my clients determining their own preferences. Technology can help and do many things, but you have to define your own policies to ensure that the solution or service works within those parameters. Helping customers understand their business and different processes is another issue not relating to the functionality of this solution."
"We raised tickets asking for improvements, but sometimes we don't get the proper solution. They are responding, but the ticket is open for weeks and weeks. For some issues, we don't get a satisfactory solution or the solution doesn't work."
"It should have a better user interface. Its flexibility should also be improved. It is not about simplifying; it is more about flexibility. Each company has its own requirements, and ForgeRock can provide more flexibility in terms of the use of existing modules to implement features for the customers."
"Some limitations in scalability. Each application we work with can be completely different, resulting in highly variable implementation processes."
"Okta has a limitation with directory integrations. If you have multiple Active Directory integrations, the user distinguished name (DN) and the manager DN don't get imported properly into the Okta user profile."
"The product must be provided for free."
"In the future, we'd like to see the product implement more security features, like, for example, zero-trust."
"This solution would be improved by adding biometrics features."
"All of the governance functionality and privileged account management could be improved."
"Users sometimes have difficulty getting verification codes."
"I would like to see the provisioning simplified."
ForgeRock is ranked 2nd in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) with 27 reviews while Okta Customer Identity is ranked 5th in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) with 13 reviews. ForgeRock is rated 8.0, while Okta Customer Identity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ForgeRock writes "Governance and access management solution used for multi-factor authentication that is outdated with an unresponsive UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Customer Identity writes "Ability to work with a wide range of applications and security mechanisms". ForgeRock is most compared with SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, Ping Identity Platform, Microsoft Entra ID, Auth0 and Amazon Cognito, whereas Okta Customer Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra Verified ID, Microsoft Entra External ID, Auth0 and Frontegg. See our ForgeRock vs. Okta Customer Identity report.
See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.
We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.