We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiGate and Palo Alto Networks VM-Series based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Firewalls solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The user interface (UI) is very, very good."
"This product is definitely scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the bundled subscription, which is IPS, TV and web filtering."
"Offers good security and filtering."
"The most valuable features are SD-WAN, application control, IPS control, and FortiSandbox."
"Fortinet FortiGate is easy to use."
"I like that they have given me a solution at a fair price."
"Reliability is the best feature. We faced some issues when we were setting it up, but the service, portal, and administration are good."
"The feature that I have found the most useful is that it meets all our requirements technically."
"In Palo Alto the most important feature is the App-ID."
"Embedding it into my application development lifecycle prevents data loss and business disruption, allowing the adoption to operate at the speed of my AWS Cloud."
"The most valuable features are web control and IPS/IDS."
"Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is very easy to use."
"The most valuable feature is the Posture Assessment."
"The VM-Series scalability is fast and easy to implement, improving our security posture as our Azure network grows."
"It provides complete security posture from end-to-end. This has given us better visibility into what our security aspects are."
"The renewal price and the availability could be improved."
"I would like to see improvements made to the dashboard and UI, as well as to the reporting."
"It could use more templates for third-party site-to-site VPN setups other than FortiGate and Cisco."
"They should make the rule sets more understandable for the end user. When you're trying to explain to somebody how a computer network is secured, sometimes it's difficult for an end user or customer to understand. If there was a way to make the terminology more accessible to the end user, the set up could be easier. They should translate the technical jargon to an easily relatable and understandable conversation for the end user, the customer, that would be brilliant. Particularly in an environment where the IT structure is audited regularly, there's always pressure from the auditor to up the standards and up the security and you get your USCERT's that come out and there's a warning about this and the customer will want to lock out so much and when you apply it they run into issue where they can't search the internet or print to their remote office. Of course they can't print to your remote office, they just locked it up. They should make the language more understandable for the customer. If there's a product out there that made the jargon understandable to John Q. Public, I would buy that."
"Lacks sufficient security options."
"I don't really have anything negative to say as far as Fortinet firewalls are concerned. If anything, they can support a user a little bit better. They can stop being so time-sensitive about how much time the support call has taken, and they can help you do it yourself."
"Pricing for it is a bit high. It could be cheaper."
"I would like to see more advanced developments of a wireless controller in the future."
"From time to time, they have released some content updates that have some issues, maybe twice a year."
"The user-friendliness of the UI could be improved."
"The one issue that I didn't like is that the SNMP integration with interfaces didn't record the interface counters."
"We have run into some issues with scaling and limitations associated with some of the configurations."
"In the next release, I would like to see better integration between the endpoints and the firewalls."
"On the cloud side, they need to come up with more HA solutions to support the multi-region."
"The reporting part of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"There should be an option for direct integration with the Azure platform."
Fortinet FortiGate is ranked 2nd in Firewalls with 306 reviews while Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is ranked 10th in Firewalls with 53 reviews. Fortinet FortiGate is rated 8.4, while Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiGate writes "It's a reliable solution that's easy to install and cheaper than competitors ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks VM-Series writes "Many features are optimized for troubleshooting real-time scenarios, saving a lot of time". Fortinet FortiGate is most compared with Sophos XG, Cisco Secure Firewall, Netgate pfSense, Meraki MX and WatchGuard Firebox, whereas Palo Alto Networks VM-Series is most compared with Azure Firewall, Fortinet FortiGate-VM, Cisco Secure Firewall, Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls and Juniper SRX Series Firewall. See our Fortinet FortiGate vs. Palo Alto Networks VM-Series report.
See our list of best Firewalls vendors.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Hello Tarun, we have been designing solutions with Palo Alto Networks NGFW for 6 years now and we have 95%+ customer retention.
I would suggest looking into customer requirement on the basis of the following things, and priority is given by the customer:
1. Internet Bandwidth
2. No. Of users - In-house and users connecting from home/outside organization network.
3. Security features required - Sandoxing, DNS Security, etc.
4. Port density required on the firewall.
5. SSL decryption.
6. Deployment - On-prem or virtual DC or on Cloud.
7. HA requirement
8. MFA requirement
9. Local presence of Palo Alto/Fortinet expert team.
10. Integration for other (operational) solutions like SD-WAN, Load balancer, etc
11. Integration with other security solution like EDR/XDR or XSOAR
12. Customer's current solution (firewall/UTM and engineers/IT team working on it).
13. Customer's current IT Team strategy
14. Customer future IT strategy (to move on the cloud, etc)
15. Customer's growth and scalability in 5 years.
16. Reporting and logging requirement.
17. Customer's budget for IT Security.
Well, I guess with these parameters, and customer's priority you can recommend them a suitable solution.
Palo Alto NGFW will be best recommended for the following:
1. Deployment on the cloud - It has a very stable PANOS for VM-Series
2. Security Innovations - Considering security, in terms of today and future, Palo Alto is disruptive and groundbreaking.
3. Predictive Bandwidth - Palo Alto NGFW gives us Predictive bandwidth, and hence, once sized, it will last longer than defined. The throughput numbers are test cases of real-world scenarios, and after enabling all the features. It operates on its patented SP3 architecture and defines device throughput after enabling all security features and operational functionalities.
4. Integration with EDR/XDR and SOAR/XSOAR platforms.
5. User/SSL VPN - When you are planning for SSL VPN on Palo Alto NGFW, it will not charge you additionally for users connecting their Windows or MAC systems on NGFW over SSL VPN. For users that are Android/IOS/Linux/etc, and required additional HIP checks and Clientless VPN, there is a single subscription you will need to purchase.
6. Sandboxing - Palo Alto came up with Wildfire which is a threat intel cloud, which can be termed as Palo Alto Network's Sandboxing solution, but it does much more than that. it has a response SLA of 5 mins, where it can convert any unknown to known in 5 minutes or less. Also, after it identifies the file, it auto-updates other engines like URL filtering, DNS Security, Anti-Spyware, Bad IP and Domain list, CNC tunnel signatures.
7. Reporting and alerting - Foremost reason why users started implementing Palo Alto firewalls inside their network was to get the visibility - in terms of User-level visibility, Network traffic (depth to application layer), and Content (files and threats) level visibility. Also, logging and reporting is provisioned on the appliance itself and no additional subscription or any appliance is required, unless the customer requires the storage of logs for more time frame. The NGFW also co-relates all the events and alerts to give critical visibility like Botnets and hosts and users accessing malicious websites, or resolving malicious domains.
8. EDL - again external dynamic lists(EDL) helps you reduce the attack surface by minimizing the traffic to and from Malicious and Bad - IPs and Domains. This list is automatically updated by Palo Alto Networks by default by its threat research teams (Unit 42), Threat Intel (Wildfire), DNS Security module, and other sources. It has also a provision for you and/or the customer to integrate other third-party URL lists to be blocked.
9. Security features:
-- DNS filtering - by intercepting DNS traffic, you will not need any additional solution and/or modification in your current network for protection against threats related to DNS traffic. Its DNS module is cloud-based and tightly integrated with other modules and features of NGFW.
-- Credential phishing - This feature will avoid users sharing/uploading their credentials which are the same to access internal resources and external websites. This will prevent the leak of user credentials.
-- ML Powered NGFW - Currently, PA NGFW is the only firewall powered by ML to prevent unknown threats in real-time.
10. Application layer firewall - complete identification of all and any traffic based on application rather than port and protocol. Not only the known but also if the application is not identified it will classify that traffic as unknown. Also, you can create a custom application as required.
and many more...
Benefits in Fortigate firewall will be:
1. More port density.
2. Better SD-WAN configuration
3. Easy User interface and hence lacks granular controls.
4. Provides seamless integration with FortiToken for MFA(additional cost).
5. Seamless integration with Forti Load balancer.
6. Low cost (than Palo Alto least).
Thanks
Darshil Sanghvi
Palo Alto, Fortinet, and Checkpoint are the best NGFW. You can choose one of them.
The Fortinet advantage is the Security Fabric. Many other Fortinet's products (switches, AP, EDS, XDR, DDoS, FortiClient, etc) are integrated and a Fortigate can communicate with another product to block an attack.
Because PA has FPGA based architecture, which no other firewall has, due to this firewall processes the traffic from all the engines simultaneously. it increase efficiency of the product and provides way better throughput as compare to other vendors. The performance of security engines of PA are better then other vendors. PA provides on-box reporting, you have to purchase forti-analyzer separately for reporting in fortinet. PA provides granular view of policies, providing insight to you which policies are used in and which are not. it also provides you the feature, that tells you which of the firewall's features are not being utilized, this way you can plan your renewal to only purchase the feature you need.
I have FortiGates and the last upgrade of firmware cut internet traffic if you use Inspection Mode Proxy-Based, recommended and more secure, you have to use Flow-based, less secure. I don't work with Palo Alto
I strongly recommend Sophos XG Firewall.
Take a look
Sophos Firewall: Synchronized Next-Gen Firewall
I think you can go with Palo Alto...
Palo Alto
I would recommend Palo Alto