We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy and Perimeter 81 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ZTNA solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I can access the information whenever I want. It's integration is easy. The tool's GUI is easy to use with an IT background. The value benefits of using it include the ability to avoid storing data on local machines, reducing the risk of data loss"
"The solution is stable."
"If you have a good understanding of infrastructure, this solution is perfect."
"The product is simple to use."
"We do not need to maintain the hardware."
"There is a lot of flexibility and a lot of control if you use this efficiently."
"Scalability-wise, it is a great product."
"It is a stable solution."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pros →
"It is a scalable solution."
"Scaling Perimeter 81 was easy to do."
"Perimeter 81 is very pretty."
"It connects quickly and stays connected. The user interface is pretty neat too. The app has in-house support with user guides that give you step-by-step walkthroughs on navigating the app. In addition, there is a live chat feature that offers prompt assistance on the go."
"Distributing the agent was very simple, allowing us to enforce security posture on our devices (i.e. S1, Disk-encryption, etc.)."
"SD-WAN is one of the primary solutions offered by Perimeter 81."
"The ease of use not only translates to quick adoption rates - it also ensures that our employees remain compliant with our cybersecurity protocols, enhancing the overall security posture of our organization."
"It has provided a seamless gateway to much-needed platforms."
"It is an expensive solution, so I would like its price to be improved."
"The cost of licenses could be better."
"Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy could be more user-friendly and less expensive."
"We encounter issues while setting up emails for the solution."
"There is room for improvement in the tools and features available on the GCP. In particular, the managed databases and queues could be improved, and it would be beneficial to have more offerings in areas such as data science and data warehousing. Additionally, GCP could benefit from offering similar tools to those offered by its competitors, such as Amazon AWS's Redshift."
"Despite using GCP for all the resources, potential clusters on GCP caused difficulties."
"The solution could be more reasonably priced. We find it to be a bit expensive right now."
"Stability-wise, the service could be improved."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Cons →
"In order to have to bypass the login using the website, a good feature for Perimeter 81 to have is a login instance in the Perimeter 81 application. I'm using a Mac and we don't have that functionality."
"The platform still lacks relevant dashboards and the ability to customize them based on our needs."
"I don't know if it is technically feasible, however, if the Desktop App could be used as a Web App or a Chrome Extension it would be very nice."
"Currently, I am not able to define a different country or location, which can result in negative experiences as the tool is being recognized by websites and this can make it difficult to access them or force me to disable the program temporarily."
"The solution's speed of upload and download is an area where it lacks"
"There is a very small amount of downtime."
"Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity."
"Its initial setup process is complex for a hybrid environment."
More Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is ranked 6th in ZTNA with 44 reviews while Perimeter 81 is ranked 3rd in ZTNA with 22 reviews. Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is rated 8.4, while Perimeter 81 is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy writes "User-friendly, easy to navigate, and intuitive interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Perimeter 81 writes "Great SAML and SCIM support with the ability to deploy site-2-site tunnels with specific IP restrictions". Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy is most compared with Cloudflare Access, Okta Workforce Identity, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Cisco Duo, whereas Perimeter 81 is most compared with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange, Cato SASE Cloud Platform, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Cloudflare Access and Tailscale. See our Google Cloud Platform Cloud Identity-Aware Proxy vs. Perimeter 81 report.
See our list of best ZTNA vendors and best ZTNA as a Service vendors.
We monitor all ZTNA reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.