We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure Object Storage and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Object Storage's best feature is that it's easy to deploy."
"With Microsoft Azure Object Storage, they are an open market."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Object Storage is that it is on the cloud."
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage is flexible and has all the features we need."
"The key feature for us is the possibility to have a copy of our data and machines outside of our premises just in case of a disaster."
"The most valuable feature is the cost value, which is very important for long term retention."
"What I like most about Microsoft Azure Object Storage is that you have many ways to access it."
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage offers hassle-free usage. It is easy to configure."
"The interface is good."
"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."
"It's a scalable product."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."
"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."
"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."
"The backup is reliable and intuitive."
"The pricing of the solution can be improved."
"Azure's technical support could be better - they take a long time to respond, and issues get transferred to multiple engineers, so you have to repeat the whole story every time without getting any proper resolution."
"Microsoft Azure Object Storage is a pretty expensive solution."
"The stability could be improved."
"We would like it if we did not have to use another encryption solution to encrypt the storage."
"The password retrieval process was very difficult."
"One of the things that are currently important is consistency. To achieve this, another database called Cosmos DB is available. We want to have a similar consistency to the one in Cosmos DB but at a cheaper price."
"I would like to have out-of-the-box connectors to make integration with other products easier."
"The solution needs to add an archive function."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."
"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."
"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."
"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."
"We cannot use the product with other brands."
"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."
"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."
More Microsoft Azure Object Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure Object Storage is ranked 10th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 45 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 13th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews. Microsoft Azure Object Storage is rated 8.0, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Object Storage writes "Can be used to safely store big datasets in the cloud at a reasonable price". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "A backup solution for data storage and restoration with point-in-time recover". Microsoft Azure Object Storage is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Wasabi and Amazon S3, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Wasabi. See our Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
