We performed a comparison between Oracle CRM and SugarCRM Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two CRM solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is scalable."
"Oracle CRM is very, very stable, one of the most stable products I've used in my career, and doesn't require much maintenance."
"The most important feature is the ability to assign a plan using the manual close function."
"The product is straightforward to set up. There's no difficulty."
"It is one of the most proficient CRM tools out there. It is comprehensive and scalable. It covers most of the CRM activities, business lines, and business requirements."
"The most valuable features of the solution are that it is user-friendly and the fact that the database handling is much better, like any other Oracle solution."
"The reporting features are valuable."
"It has a wide variety of use cases."
"The most valuable feature is relation capability, which allows us to relay customers with invoice orders."
"The most valuable features of Sugar Enterprise are the exports of graphics, statuses, complaints, and tasks."
"The most valuable features of the SugarCRM platform include its flexibility in customizing fields, layouts, and dashboards."
"It works well with Jira. You can customize it to fit your needs."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is its low cost."
"An improvement would be to lower the price of the license."
"The one thing that I hate about it is when you pay for services for a certain amount of time, the service ends just before it should be over. For example, I may pay for a month of service, but it will tell me the service is over before the month ends."
"The product's UI lags, and with all the new technologies, it is not quick enough to adopt them."
"Our infrastructure is set up for an on-premises deployment of this solution and I am concerned that the online deployment that we are moving to will not perform as well as our current on-premises storage systems. It could cause some problems, such as latency delays."
"The user interface and performance could be better."
"Customization is an area in the solution that takes too much time. So, it needs to be improved."
"The configuration requires a lot of technical intervention."
"With Oracle CRM, people report some usual downtime and frequent outages."
"While it is already user-friendly, a slight enhancement in UI design, especially in terms of color combinations, could make the platform more visually appealing and comfortable to use."
"I would like to see more integration on a mobile platform in the next release."
"Sugar Enterprise could improve by removing bugs and glitches. For example, a comment was made but in the comment section, it was never displayed. However, the problems we faced might not be the fault of the solution."
"You cannot include all your entities under one instance at the moment."
"It lacks customization, and this is the main reason that we are switching to a different solution."
"In the next release, I would like to see personalization of information about customers or specific businesses or opportunities."
Oracle CRM is ranked 7th in CRM with 35 reviews while SugarCRM Platform is ranked 24th in CRM with 11 reviews. Oracle CRM is rated 8.0, while SugarCRM Platform is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Oracle CRM writes "Typical configuration, no customization needed and quick to deploy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SugarCRM Platform writes "User-friendly and allows for creating your own modules". Oracle CRM is most compared with Siebel CRM, SAP CRM, Microsoft Dynamics CRM, Amdocs CRM and Salesforce Sales Cloud, whereas SugarCRM Platform is most compared with Salesforce Sales Cloud. See our Oracle CRM vs. SugarCRM Platform report.
See our list of best CRM vendors and best Marketing Automation vendors.
We monitor all CRM reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.