We performed a comparison between PageUp People and SAP SuccessFactors based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The talent acquisition and the onboarding components of the system are most valuable."
"The performance of the solution is very good."
"What I like the most is the KPI management formula."
"The interface is really useful and it's very easy to combine different information. For example, we can easily get reports that we need. It's very easy to create reports."
"The tool has a unique talent management platform."
"What I appreciate most about SAP SuccessFactors is that it has all the modules in one platform. SAP SuccessFactors is the best option in the market for HR use cases. I also find the solution user-friendly."
"The self-service part is most valuable. Employees and managers can do a lot of things on their own, and they are not dependent on the HR organization."
"The most valuable features of SAP SuccessFactors are onboarding, recruiting, marketing, and performance."
"Overall, it's excellent performance management."
"They could probably add surveying, as in engagement surveys, to their product. That would be something that would be valued by their customers. For instance, Culture Amp is a product that does a lot of the engagement stuff. They're diversifying into other aspects of talent management. It is not yet at the same scale as PageUp People, but it is an excellent product as well."
"The integration between the recruitment module and employee central is a big problem."
"The complete integration process between SuccessFactors modules is not at the level that all customers expect when it comes to complete HR user experience from all angles."
"They should be more user friendly and give us more tools to make it more flexible."
"The Onboarding module must be improved."
"SAP SuccessFactors functionality doesn't meet the expectation of our end users. There are other solutions that have better functionality, such as Workday, which is one of the top applications. Additionally, the solution could be easier to use."
"We encountered challenges with the tool's integration with third-party applications and deployments."
"To explain one feature that I would like to see in SuccessFactors, I must describe a similar feature as seen in Oracle. In Oracle, there's a feature called Workforce Prediction, and with this feature, we can predict some of the behaviors of any employee. For example, the software can attempt to predict whether the employee might resign in future, or perhaps if they will start to perform better. This is something that is missing in SuccessFactors."
"Everything, including the provisioning dependency, should be moved to the instance, and coding should be kept to a minimum. Wherever possible, coding should be minimized, and everything should be a drag-and-drop."
Earn 20 points
PageUp People is ranked 29th in Talent Management while SAP SuccessFactors is ranked 1st in Talent Management with 90 reviews. PageUp People is rated 7.8, while SAP SuccessFactors is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of PageUp People writes "Has all-inclusive pricing and good talent acquisition and onboarding components, and is an excellent product for mid-sized to large organizations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP SuccessFactors writes "Offers many useful modules and integrations, and helps companies adhere to best practices". PageUp People is most compared with Workday and UKG, whereas SAP SuccessFactors is most compared with SAP HCM, Workday, Oracle HCM Cloud, PeopleSoft and UKG. See our PageUp People vs. SAP SuccessFactors report.
See our list of best Talent Management vendors and best Talent Acquisition vendors.
We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.