PageUp People vs UKG comparison

PageUp People

Read 11 PageUp People reviews

396 Views
269 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

UKG

Read 121 UKG reviews

11,306 Views
3,331 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

PageUp People

UKG

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between PageUp People and UKG based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Talent Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed PageUp People vs. UKG Report (Updated: May 2024).

Buyer's Guide

PageUp People vs. UKG

May 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 787,226 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

PageUp People

Ranking in Talent Management

31st

Ranking in Talent Acquisition

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UKG

Ranking in Talent Management

6th

Ranking in Talent Acquisition

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

121

Ranking in other categories

Benefits Administration (6th), Employee Scheduling Software (1st), Cloud HCM (5th), Employee Time Tracking Software (4th), HR Analytics Software (1st)

Market share comparison

As of June 2024, in the Talent Management category, the market share of PageUp People is 0.3% and it increased by 25.4% compared to the previous year. The market share of UKG is 4.1% and it increased by 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Talent Management

Unique Categories:

Talent Acquisition

0.4%

Benefits Administration

6.4%

Featured Reviews

CarloGalati

Director at Edge HR

Mar 23, 2022

Has all-inclusive pricing and good talent acquisition and onboarding components, and is an excellent product for mid-sized to large organizations

We typically do the requirements, and we recommend a system to our clients, and they contract directly with that provider The talent acquisition and the onboarding components of the system are most valuable. By Australian standards, it is a pretty good system. If I were to benchmark it against…

Read full review

reviewer1176129

Sr. Systems Engineer at RSA Security

Aug 3, 2022

A complete solution that provides a unified view of everything and brings efficiency

I would advise checking the entirety of the use cases they have. We started with a few modules, and then the company found out that they had different modules that could be incremented in the solution, and now, we are using more parts of the system. So, evaluate everything before making a decision and make sure you have all the features you need right from the beginning. I would rate it an eight out of ten. It is a very good solution. They are on a good path. It definitely has room for improvement like every other solution in the market. They just need to improve it a little bit in terms of usability, and that's all. It looks complete to me.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The talent acquisition and the onboarding components of the system are most valuable."

"The product's most valuable feature is the ability to establish connectivity between the front and the back end, particularly the single point of data entry, to minimize mistakes."

"The setup process is straightforward."

"It enables us to manage the system ourselves. We don't need an additional team to do a lot of maintenance and add the things that we want."

"The tool improved employee onboarding efficiency, especially in healthcare, where timely onboarding is crucial. This change directly impacted retention rates positively. It was a massive project that involved various teams working together. It took about a year to revamp the entire process and ensure compliance. However, once implemented, it improved employee satisfaction by saving them two whole days in the onboarding process."

"It is much easier to use and the customer service is better than our previous solution."

"I like UKG's integration."

"The solution has improved our organization by helping us cut hours and lessen our labor force. It saved us probably over $100,000 in just the last couple of years."

"UKG allows us to customize our home screen so that we can easily monitor important items on a daily basis."

More UKG pros

Cons

"They could probably add surveying, as in engagement surveys, to their product. That would be something that would be valued by their customers. For instance, Culture Amp is a product that does a lot of the engagement stuff. They're diversifying into other aspects of talent management. It is not yet at the same scale as PageUp People, but it is an excellent product as well."

"I would like the capability to use UKG as a single platform without the need to alternate between systems."

"The solution could improve by simplifying it even more core reports, such as more sample reports, more generic reports that you can edit and improve on yourself."

"The navigation on the screen could be better. Sometimes, I have to dig a little bit deep to find what I need. Everything is there. It just needs to be a little bit smoother."

"The tool needs improvement on the configuration side."

"UKG could be a little more flexible in some areas."

"One area where UKG could improve is in its ability to understand its own competency and then work hard to improve it."

"The platform's features need enhancement while being used as a recruiting tool."

"I would like to see more functionality in the next release to be able to get hours and dollars per calendar month rather than just by payroll in the Business Intelligence reports."

More UKG cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"PageUp has a different model from other organizations. As part of their pricing structure, they tend to work with you very closely and not charge you for the setup. So, there is one price all inclusive of setup, and for that reason, they become an attractive provider to work with. Here in Australia, the education sector has gravitated very heavily towards PageUp."

"UKG's pricing and licensing model involves ongoing expenses based on the number of employees paid. The initial implementation cost is low when UKG implements it directly. However, when partners handle the implementation, it becomes more expensive since partners don't receive the monthly recurring fees."

"While I am unsure of the licensing cost itself, the total cost of implementation and licensing for a company with over 5000 employees would be around 6,00,000. So, there are additional costs beyond licensing."

"I wasn't involved in the pricing part. I'm a user, and I believe it is based on the user count. One thing that is nice about Ultimate is that you can learn how to use the system without additional fees. The learning aspect is the life of a product, and the training was a huge reason why we went with Ultimate. We did have some integration costs. They were a part of the implementation because of the integrations to other systems that we included in our implementation."

"The platform is not affordable but also not the most expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Talent Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

787,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Legal Firm

14%

University

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Educational Organization

86%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about UKG?

I like UKG's integration.

See all answers

What needs improvement with UKG?

UKG could be a little more flexible in some areas.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for UKG?

We use UKG for payroll and other core HR functions.

See all answers

Comparisons

Workday vs PageUp People

Compared 41% of the time

SAP SuccessFactors vs PageUp People

Compared 24% of the time

More PageUp People Competitors

Workday vs UKG

Compared 29% of the time

SAP SuccessFactors vs UKG

Compared 16% of the time

PeopleSoft vs UKG

Compared 10% of the time

SAP HCM vs UKG

Compared 7% of the time

More UKG Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Talent Management

June 2024

Download PageUp People product report

Buyer's Guide

UKG

May 2024

Download UKG product report

Also Known As

No data available

UKG Pro, UKG Dimensons, UKG Ready

Learn More

PageUp People

UKG

Overview

SaaS tool that assists organizations in recruitment and on-boarding, performance management, leadership development, and succession planning.

At UKG, our purpose is people — real people with real challenges, and a simple request. Help me keep my employees productive, connected, and happy. So that’s what we did.

We’ve created an unmatched suite of HR and workforce management solutions, backed by our people who care about yours. Our solutions deliver global workforce experiences that truly reflect the connection between life and work today. That means insights are deeper. Work is easier. And interactions are more meaningful.

Sample Customers

MYER, Target, coles, Fujitsu, Michael Hill

Tesla, Marriott, Yamaha, Aramark, Feeding America, Samsung, Sony Music, Dave & Buster's, Revlon

Buyer's Guide

PageUp People vs. UKG

May 2024

Free Report: PageUp People vs. UKG

Find out what your peers are saying about PageUp People vs. UKG and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

787,226 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our PageUp People vs. UKG report.

See our list of best Talent Management vendors and best Talent Acquisition vendors.

We monitor all Talent Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.