We performed a comparison between ESET EDR/XDR and Microsoft Entra ID based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems."The solution is easy to use."
"The two-factor authentication provides an additional layer of security for our organizational data, so Microsoft Authenticator plays a crucial role in making our confidential data more secure."
"Single sign-on provides flexibility and helps because users don't want to remember so many passwords when logging in. It's a major feature. Once you log in, you have access to all the applications. It also enables us to provide backend access controls to our users, especially when it comes to groups, as we are trying to normalize things."
"Azure AD has features that have helped improve our security posture."
"It is a central point where we provide the cloud lock-in for our company. We focus the multi-factor authentication within Azure AD before jumping to other clouds or software as a service offerings. So, it is the central point when you need to access something for our company within the cloud. You go to Azure AD and can authenticate there, then you move from there to the target destination or the single sign-on."
"I would say that Azure AD's pricing is very reasonable because of the structure and in terms of the solution."
"The most valuable feature is that it is very easy to implement, you don't need a lot of effort to set up the solution. This is the most advantageous point, that you can do anything on Azure without taking too much time."
"The most valuable feature is the factor identification. I find that it is natural integration, and it is just a natural step. I do not need to do anything else."
"The technical support is pretty good."
"The solution could improve how it scours each website."
"Lacks integration between applications and phones."
"The ability to manage and authenticate against on-premises solutions would be beneficial."
"I want to see new functionalities for the active directory."
"I haven't had any issues with the product."
"Compared to what we can do on-prem, Azure AD lacks a feature for multiple hierarchical groups. For example, Group A is part of group B. Group B is part of group C. Then, if I put someone into group A, which is part of already B, they get access to any system that group B has access to, and that provisioning is automatically there."
"At first, it was a bit challenging to come up with a workaround that would get authentication to work."
"Sometimes, the notifications and alerts are not delivered properly, and we end up missing them. Also, the overall graphical user interface needs to be improved."
"The solution has certain limitations. For example, it has very little governance functionality."
ESET EDR/XDR is ranked 35th in Authentication Systems with 1 review while Microsoft Entra ID is ranked 1st in Authentication Systems with 190 reviews. ESET EDR/XDR is rated 0.0, while Microsoft Entra ID is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of ESET EDR/XDR writes "An easy-to-use solution that could improve it’s website-scouring capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Entra ID writes "Saves us time and money and features Conditional Access policies, SSPR, and MFA". ESET EDR/XDR is most compared with Wazuh, Microsoft Defender XDR, Bitdefender GravityZone EDR, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response and Datto Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), whereas Microsoft Entra ID is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Google Cloud Identity, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Ping Identity Platform and Okta Workforce Identity.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.