We are using it in an operational mode, when we have trouble easily getting the root cause, getting the application back up and running.
Based on that, the product has worked very well for us. We are happy with it.
We are using it in an operational mode, when we have trouble easily getting the root cause, getting the application back up and running.
Based on that, the product has worked very well for us. We are happy with it.
It's really opened our eyes. We had point solutions where we could see different elements of the stack, and Dynatrace ties everything together. Before, we could never get that full-stack monitoring. It prevents that, "Oh, it's your problem. No, it's your problem," type of an issue, and it allows us to get to that problem.
It also helps us get us the context of the customer experience. What's the business impact of those problems? And we've never had that before. That has been good.
Where we are struggling is being able to pull that information out and combine it with other contextual information that we have in other sources. Mining that data in a big-data environment, and joining it together and coming up with larger types of analysis on it. Big-data types of issues. We're still blazing a trail, trying to figure that out. But it's not as easy as some of the other things we've been able to do with the product.
Very stable. Very happy with it.
We have a lot of our infrastructure on it, so it's meeting our needs, for our enterprise. We have thousands of agents that are out there in over a thousand applications, and it's meeting our needs with that.
I think it's good. They are very responsive and get back to us. They try to give us workarounds and follow up with us. So, we're happy with that.
We have an infrastructure group and I'm more on the business-unit side, but I was part of our PoC as we brought it in, and stood it up. Generally, it was very easy to get it set up and get going very quickly. It was pretty easy. We used some of the Dynatrace sales team and the engineers to help us get it set up, but in short order, we had it going.
AppDynamics and New Relic were the other two.
We were never able to get AppDynamics working in our PoC. We couldn't get it working on our web servers. New Relic didn't meet some of our shortlist criterion.
Regarding the nature of digital complexity, I think the role of AI is becoming more critical when it comes to IT's ability to scale in the cloud and manage performance problems. It's because of the complexity and the number of elements that are out there, and being able to completely understand what the problem is. There was a good quote from one of the last keynote presentations here at the Perform 2018 conference: "Let's not chase $500 issues. Using AI allows us to go for those bigger issues," and look for more value, rather than worrying about all the little things that happen. AI would give us the ability to handle that low-level work, very quickly - the auto remediation - get that back up and going. It would buy us time to do higher-level work.
We've used a lot tools at our company, including siloed monitoring tools. Some of the main things we're seeing with them are gaps in the ability to handle emerging technology; things like single-page applications, Angular applications, single sign-on applications, those types of things.
When looking at purchasing an APM solution, we wanted something that was a proven leader. We looked at industry review rankings. Did it support the technologies we develop our applications on? Can it give us that full-stack view into our architecture? Can it tell us what's going on with the customer experience? Those types of things.
If I had a friend looking to adopt an APM solution, I'd really have him take a look at Dynatrace. It's an industry leader. We've had a great experience with them. It meets our needs. They're future-looking. Even though we're not where they are in terms of the capabilities they have, we know we're going to need those capabilities in the future. Great product.
The main use of Dynatrace is development assistance through to live deployment, then proactive monitoring. Afterwards, monitoring of the infrastructure and live site.
Being able to track issues found in live back through environments is particularly useful.
The obvious benefits are proactive monitoring, but there were the unexpected results we gained from it that brought additional value out of the product:
This is not a simple product. You cannot fire and forget. Maybe not a specific function issue that needs resolving, but certainly an area for consideration upon adoption of the product.
Training is required for all of the people who will be using it, and this should not be overlooked. I would even recommend nominating an SME in each of the three areas covered: user behaviour analysis, development, and infrastructure/operations support.
We have had some issues, mainly in the JS embedded in the page.
None.
We have used them extensively. They are very eager to help.
Reviewed other products, but never switched.
Fairly complicated, but it is an in-depth product.
In-house.
As a user, I can testify that we found an issue within the first week of ownership that has been costing us more than the entire license cost.
Do not ignore the training!
Yes, AppDynamics, New Relic, and one other.
Being able to dig into code to figure out errors and where response time is slow.
We have setup proactive alerts to notify us when certain conditions are met, such as when we are out of memory or high threads.
I cannot think of any off hand. They are continuously making the product better.
I've been using Dynatrace Application Monitoring and Data Center RUM for three years.
(version 6.0)
I'm not aware of any issues.
No, it is very scalable.
10 out of 10 as they are great to work with.
Technical Support:9 out of 10, but it could be 10 out of 10. They are very prompt and technical. They will work with you to fix any issues.
No, we reviewed other vendors and thought this one was the best.
It was simple to implement.
Dynatrace came in, helped install it and then showed us how to use the product.
We serve multiple customers and everyone wants to use Dynatrace. It has paid for itself. We can now figure out issues so much quicker.
CA was one other options we considered amongst others.
We use Dynatrace for a number of internal applications that we track in addition to API calls associated with the API engine. We have a partnership with Dynatrace and I'm a project manager.
We monitor critical internal applications including some public-facing applications. Internal transactions are being tracked and we get immediate feedback from the solution's monitoring which makes a big difference to us.
The value of this solution is in terms of the functionality, and every aspect of the hardware and connection-oriented signals that we get. We use most of the features on a daily basis.
Network monitoring doesn't seem to be a key focus of the company and if that were improved this could be a one-stop solution that would monitor the application. It would be quite useful in the data center environment as well.
I've been using this solution for four years.
The solution is stable.
The solution is scalable, we have around 50 users.
I am unaware of licensing costs.
It's a wonderful product and I would definitely recommend it. I rate this solution eight out of 10.
Overall, it's a good platform.
The solution has a very good user interface.
The product can scale.
It's fairly easy to set up and manage.
It will be great IF we could show (automatically, from the dynatrace dashboard) to the customer how much they are reducing costs, doing more business and no environment's stopped.
We've been using the solution since 2015. it's been about six years or so at this point.
No worries about that.
The solution can scale, however, if you have a large amount of infrastructure you will need to pay more. I find that if you start with just a small part (the critical part), you'll better understand why you need more of it and scaling will come naturally. It's not just about managing the servers and applications. It's about the user experience too.
I haven't really dealt with technical support. However, our tech team is quite capable of handling any issues should they arise.
We are also familiar with IBM SOLUTIONS.
The solution is very easy to implement and easy to administer. It's not overly complex.
Our IT team is capable of handling any implementation our clients need.
What I try to say to my customer is that, okay, it's not so expensive, if you could see the return of investment you will get. However, in Brazil, we have some difficulties when it comes to showing these numbers to the customer (they don't have the actualized numbers). It might be better, in the current market to just try to sell it to IT instead of across departments.
The pricing is quite high and many customers do not want to pay for it.
We are an IBM partner and are beginning to work with solutions such as Instana as well. We're also partners with Dynatrace.
In the last three years, we've started to grow our customers and have new use cases. I believe due to the movement towards digital transformation, we have more opportunities to show the benefits of a platform like Dynatrace.
We are using the private and public domain from Dynatrace, however, we have customers and major financial customers who prefer to use either private clouds or a private environment. We believe that it doesn't matter where they are. I'm happy with this model, as we could get faster results in two weeks when we are implementing Dynatrace to our customers. It's faster to implement on the cloud.
I'd rate the solution at a nine out of ten. We've been quite happy with its capabilities overall.
We use Dynatrace as an analytics and monitoring tool. It is on-premise at the moment. We're looking at using the cloud-based one in the next year or so. We're in the process of migrating over to the cloud-based one.
The Davis artificial intelligence built-in program is valuable. It keeps all the information about the systems, connections, service calls, and requests in its database. It looks at response times and keeps everything in check with baseline figures. If anything goes outside of that baseline, it reports based on that. If the performance starts degrading, it reports on that. Before something breaks, it tells you that it is going to break, and that's the most useful feature of Dynatrace.
It is useful for analytics, web performance, end-to-end coverage of a user experience, and database analytics. It is absolutely a monitoring tool that is worth having. The visibility that it provides is a unique feature of this product.
Its price, for sure, should be improved. Its price is quite high. Other than the price, there are always improvements to be made as technologies change. When we move into cloud-based technologies, Dynatrace will also have to adapt so that they can monitor those as well. It should have the adaptability to quickly transform to monitor those new technologies.
I have been using Dynatrace for the last six years.
Currently, we have around 2,000 to 3,000 users. It is very extensively used. We are covering all our production systems and major revenue systems with Dynatrace. It is our primary monitoring system.
Their technical support is brilliant. They are online 24/7. You go into a chat window, and you talk to their support people. They can connect directly with your system and monitor it. They even tell you if something is wrong. It is the best support that I've ever had on any monitoring system. It is not just you monitoring it; it is them monitoring it as well at the same time.
Its installation is extremely easy. You just install an agent on the server. You can just follow the default installation. As long as you've got your system set up and your architecture set up to connect those agents into your Dynatrace cluster, everything is done within minutes.
I do it by myself. I'm a systems administrator. I take care of its deployment and maintenance. I build the system, and I connect the system to other systems. Any user who is trained on how to do it will also be able to do it.
Its price is quite high. Although it is worth it, it would be better if its price is reduced.
They base their prices around licensing. Their prices are based on agent licensing and consumption licensing. Both of these can be a bit cheaper, but if they are the best in the market, as I consider them to be, I assume that their prices will be higher. They are delivering the product for that price.
I would absolutely recommend this solution. There is no better product on the market.
I love Dynatrace. I might be biased, but I would give it a nine out of ten.
The one that we recently scripted was just to see if an application was up, it was a very simple script. We had an issue with a vended solution at the university in which the application would just go down and the vendor had said that, "Oh, it never goes down, we have 100% uptime." We didn't have a good way to monitor that before. We said, "Our students our reporting that they cannot log in." With Synthetics, we wrote a very simple script that went to the landing page and tried to type and hit "enter," and that's it.
We have two-factor and some other things that prevent us from going too far into it, and we haven't figured out a technical solution for it, but it's a very simple use case of just making sure that the application is up.
Dynatrace itself is performing well.
We now know when the application is down, as opposed to students opening tickets and letting us know. So it's more proactive.
That it's always running.
From what I've learned today, here at the Perform 2018 conference, there are two things that I really want to see.
Number one, the thing that is preventing MSU from moving forward with Dynatrace right now is that we can't tag our customer traffic with a customizable tag. All of our students have a unique identifier and in AppMon we tag that and we can search by it very easily and it's very useful. But in Dynatrace, you can't yet customize and find people like that, so that's really preventing us. I heard that it's being worked on but I'm not sure when it's coming out.
The second thing that I'd really love to see is - I'm very impressed by all the new features that I've learned about at the conference - and one of the features is "impacted users." I would like to see a rate of impacted users. For example, how long has the problem been going on: 100 users in five minutes. Does that mean that in 3 hours if we don't get this solved, we're impacting x number of people? Understanding the rate at which the problem is impacting people would be a cool feature.
It seems very stable.
With the AI, it seems very scalable.
We're going through a proof of concept right now, so we work very closely. They're knowledgeable and we get the right person whenever we call.
We didn't have a previous APM solution. We didn't know we needed this solution until we saw it. It was literally students calling in with problem tickets.
I'm just a supervisor, so I sat with our technician during setup. I didn't do any of the actual work, but it seems seamless. It installed in about two minutes. I really wanted to see it. I have to go to the assistant director and, eventually, the director and try to explain why I think we need the new technology.
They went through a whole eight month process. I wasn't there, I'm a new manager, but I understand they had over a dozen companies. They had spreadsheets of all the pros and cons. They went with Dynatrace because it just has more features.
Regarding AI and the ability of IT to scale into the cloud and manage performance problems, we don't have the new technology yet, we don't have the new AI, we have the old AppMon and Synthetics. But it seems like it's very important.
We have used siloed monitoring tools in the past. The university is very old and very segmented and different departments use different tools and we don't all talk to each other. We still have this problem today and we're trying to get more user adoption for Dynatrace. But it's difficult.
If we had just one solution that could provide real answers, and not just data, I think that we would spend less time working on things that probably don't matter, like mundane routine operations.
To me, the most important criteria when working with a vendor is responsiveness to issues.
My advice to colleagues would be, do your homework. But, I would be surprised if anybody would beat Dynatrace.
We are using Dynatrace for application monitoring.
In the past, we would spend more time on identifying the root cause and finding the solution. After implementing Dynatrace, we easily see that we are capturing all the exceptions. Just build on the error message, then we usually quickly fix it.
Dynatrace is performing well so far.
We have identified some critical issues, which are not available or recreatable in the Dev or QA environment. They are only happening in production, and they are easy for us to identify in the production environment. We can usually identify issues and fix them.
The data monitoring is good for us, and also the performance monitoring. We have been using both extensively for the last three to four months. We have been capturing all the information and evaluating whether it can be improved or not.
Since we have been receiving alerts from Dynatrace, we go ahead and fix them without the user knowing about them. Sometimes the users never know that they are having issues and they are stuck. So, in 10 minutes, we fix it and business runs as usual without any problem.
I am able to identify issues very quickly.
I just heard about the management zone. I also got some hands-on with the early version. I feel it is a good feature to handle integrating all the services together in one place.
So far, the stability has been good.
Not yet, we started just six months before. Right now, we are on six to seven applications been monitored.
We started implementing microservices. Microservices means now it is hundreds of services. In the future, maybe in three to six months, we are expecting thousands of services will be implemented. In this way, the solution will definitely help us to identify the entire thousands of services that need to be monitored. So, it will gives us some alert and we build on it.
We did use technical support in the initial phase when we were struggling to get into the tool. We felt they were knowledgeable.
They do have a salesperson we can contact in India.
Our switch to Dynatrace was very internal. We got a different management team, and the new management team came in and decided that we needed Dynatrace now. They had experience with it already. They knew that where we were facing issues on monitoring side.
There were some other monitoring tools, like SolarWinds. However, the new management team felt that Dynatrace would be the perfect for us.
We were and still are using SolarWinds as a monitoring application.
I was not involved in the initial setup or upgrades.
I would recommend doing a PoC.
Before adopting Dynatrace, we were evaluating multiple systems, such as AppDynamics and SolarWinds.
I am not much into the area of AI, but I still see it removing some of the non-value added work which we are doing daily, such as sitting and monitoring the server, which is not a value addition. AI is an area where we get somebody to watch it, we get alerts, then we act on them instead of just going through all the locks. Especially IoT side, even though I am on the development side, still we concentrate on AI and IoT, where we see more focus and we just started learning all those things, and implementing them in our company.
If I had a solution which would give me a real answer, not just a data, the immediate benefit would be a global application and support, because we are working in Asia. Sometimes we get incidences during the US morning when we are not at the office. If I can get the benefit of a solution, which can alert us and solve itself. It is an automation thing where we do not want to wake up late at night and work on the application.
Most important criteria when selecting a vendor: A vendor should be reachable at any time.