We performed a comparison between AgilePoint and Bizagi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management."
"AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth."
"The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy."
"The solution's workflows are its most useful feature."
"I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use."
"Process management is easy with Bizagi; validating processes and assigning resources is straightforward."
"Agility, reverse engineering, customized portal web, help desk and user guides, easy deployment, simple to modify."
"I like the integration part, and I also like how they use the database, such as the data when they implement all the data side, and how you can easily integrate it with their widgets."
"I like the ease of use and the fact that you can download and use their free version, which is unlimited. However, while it's unlimited use, some features aren't available."
"The approval process is simple."
"The amount of control that this solution provides is great."
"Very user friendly and a professional solution."
"Your team can work on it having basic training about databases and BPM modeling."
"They should add more information about functionality."
"It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer."
"While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta."
"Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes."
"The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier."
"The on-premise software has some bugs."
"One of the features which could be improved is machine learning. Even though this product has been working on this topic, we can see that it still requires improvement."
"Bizagi allows for automation, but it's very complicated."
"The product must make automation easier."
"Difficult to export in formats other than PDF."
"Its price can be improved. The price is high for the application as well as for maintaining and developing applications. When you develop, for example, a BPM, you need to pay a lot for Bizagi."
"I think that they could improve their update process. Some of the process mining techniques could be added to Bizagi. I think that they can improve their simulation abilities to include more elements of the BPMN."
"Bizagi's UI should include shorter steps for documenting controls, documenting properties, changing some attributes in the object, and adding additional text."
AgilePoint is ranked 32nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 5 reviews while Bizagi is ranked 7th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 78 reviews. AgilePoint is rated 8.0, while Bizagi is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of AgilePoint writes " An affordable tool to create workflows requiring an easy initial setup phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". AgilePoint is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Mendix, OutSystems, Nintex Process Platform and Camunda, whereas Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and ARIS BPA. See our AgilePoint vs. Bizagi report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, best Rapid Application Development Software vendors, and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
