We performed a comparison between GitHub CoPilot and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."
"The initial setup of the product is easy."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."
"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"GitHub CoPilot helps us auto-complete code. The tool's context awareness benefits our projects because it identifies the context in which we are working and automatically proposes solutions that we use."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPMI would be the academy courses, specifically the Product Development Network (PDN). Additionally, our organization has a dedicated Customer Engagement Team that we work closely with to achieve our goals."
"In general, we use web services to integrate this solution with our other tools. It is the main approach we use with this solution and it integrates with all tools that we need. If you want to integrate with other solutions such ThreatFire or similar, it is possible as well."
"The user interface and the ease of developing the workflow for an application are valuable features."
"The solution is operating well overall."
"The workflows are the most valuable features, particularly for us, because we were attempting to automate processes by utilizing workflows to provide a hands-off comparison between the bot and the human."
"This solution is useful for business process management if you have any banking solutions or need to manage a process."
"Overall, the ability to integrate with multiple applications and effective case management is the most valuable."
"I have a lot of experience in this kind of industry, and Pega is one of the best solutions in terms of performance, capabilities, and the way we develop."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages."
"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."
"In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results."
"GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement."
"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."
"The UI part needs improvement."
"Sometimes when we are patching some data from the database, we are getting added as a timeout."
"It is scalable, but it also interacts with a lot of other systems. I think they thought that the interface to other systems, legacy systems, was its strength, but when problems do occur, quickly diagnosing those problems has been a challenge."
"UI needs improvement."
"Currently, there isn't any feature I want to be added in the next release of Pega BPM because Pega always adds new features that my team welcomes and looks forward to learning. One area for improvement in the solution is the long learning curve, but after that, you'll find Pega BPM easy to use."
"The licensing cost is very high."
"The solution's pricing model or licensing model could be a little better."
"This is an expensive solution."
GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 11 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 7th in Rapid Application Development Software with 57 reviews. GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.6, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Provides built-in frameworks that can be reused and reduces time and cost". GitHub CoPilot is most compared with GitLab, Oracle Application Express (APEX), ServiceNow, Mendix and OutSystems, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, IBM BPM and ARIS BPA. See our GitHub CoPilot vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.