We performed a comparison between KiSSFLOW and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The user interface is very, very good."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"The flexibility and speed in modifying and creating processes are great features. If we have a process in mind, we can usually create it within ten minutes."
"The support team responds fast."
"The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"We particularly like the workflow connectors in the forms, for information introduction purposes."
"You can easily connect Power Apps with other databases, like Excel, SharePoint, SQL, etc."
"There is value in being able to collect and compare information in real-time to present alternatives for correcting vulnerabilities."
"The features I find the most valuable are the 365 and Microsoft applications integrations and the automation."
"The platform has valuable features for opportunity and finance management. It has all the essential features for customer service."
"I have found the technical support to be helpful."
"It offers integration with several Microsoft products, including SharePoint and Outlook, in my opinion, is a huge plus."
"The most valuable feature is the time-to-market because you can make apps pretty fast."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."
"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."
"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."
"The set up of the solution could be simpler."
"I would like to see more improvement, for example, in direct collaboration."
"Its user interface can be better. It is good, but it can be a bit clunky."
"If the price was reduced and the quality of the user interfaces was improved it would be beneficial."
"PowerApps can't do a lot of things that users need now. For example, it can't handle signatures."
"The notion people have is that no code equals no knowledge, and that's simply not true. Even though you don't have to write codes, you still have to know what you're doing."
"The area where this product can be improved is the documentation. When we get stuck it's with the documentation when we are not able to find the codes we need."
"We'd like to see more integration capabilities in the future."
KiSSFLOW is ranked 14th in Rapid Application Development Software with 12 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews. KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". KiSSFLOW is most compared with Camunda, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform, Appian and OutSystems, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service. See our KiSSFLOW vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.