We performed a comparison between Camunda and KiSSFLOW based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner."
"We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation."
"It is a scalable product. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten."
"The solution is useful for small projects."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."
"The graphical interface is very beneficial."
"We have the ability to modify the product if we need to, and that comes in handy whenever we need to add new functionality and features."
"Having knowledge of the BPM and monitoring process has proven to be very beneficial, as I am currently engaged in documenting processes for Clientele."
"The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"The support team responds fast."
"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."
"Documentation can be improved."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"The latency of API could be decreased."
"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."
"Initial setup can be quite complex."
"The migration strategy needs to be improved."
"The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."
"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user."
"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."
"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform, Appian and Bizagi. See our Camunda vs. KiSSFLOW report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
