We performed a comparison between Barracuda Email Security Gateway and Fortra's Agari based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Secure Email Gateway (SEG) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This product is powerful and quite simple to use."
"It's easy to use. The configuration and web interface are user-friendly."
"It not only tackles spam effectively but also incorporates advanced features like ATP and active features which ensures a comprehensive and adaptable email security solution tailored to their heterogeneous environment."
"The solution's anti-spam features are its most valuable aspect."
"The solution is scalable."
"It is very simple to whitelist addresses."
"It can scale."
"The link protection and anti-phishing features are great."
"It comes with a lot of helpful tips for complicated areas."
"If spam or some kind of malicious email gets past Mimecast and gets into our email environment, we can go into Agari and we can search for it."
"I am impressed with the tool's discovery capabilities which help me find out who is sending the emails on the company's behalf. I also find the ability to detect and generate reports on phishing emails a valuable feature."
"It is really important for large companies to have the brand protection that is provided by Agari."
"Barracuda has shown difficulty in providing us with the solutions we sought."
"There are limited administration controls that should be improved."
"We are using the tool’s 400 model which does not offer accurate spam detection. We have also had performance issues with the tool."
"Barracuda isn't catching everything. We're still getting quite a few phishing emails, so we're looking for something else."
"The downsides of the solution stem from the fact that it is an expensive product, and one may see too many false positives when using it, making them both areas where improvements are required."
"The dashboard's UI could be improved to make changes to the blocklist."
"Artificial intelligence improvement could be used to help block spam and phishing mail that is directly delivered to users."
"There is room for improvement in the management of multiple domains."
"Some customers in the financial sector do not like the cloud solution because they don't want data to be transferred to a US-based cloud."
"The product's user interface is clunky. We have difficulty in finding what we need. I would also like to see automation in the onboarding processes."
"The protocol is quite complicated, which may not be something that could be improved, but it would be better if it was simplified."
More Barracuda Email Security Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →
Barracuda Email Security Gateway is ranked 2nd in Secure Email Gateway (SEG) with 51 reviews while Fortra's Agari is ranked 27th in Email Security with 4 reviews. Barracuda Email Security Gateway is rated 8.0, while Fortra's Agari is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Barracuda Email Security Gateway writes "Robust email protection with advanced features such as effective spam filtering, virus and malware defense, phishing protection and high scalability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortra's Agari writes "Helps to detect and generate reports on phishing emails and saves from email compromises ". Barracuda Email Security Gateway is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Fortinet FortiMail, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP), Proofpoint Email Protection and Cisco Secure Email, whereas Fortra's Agari is most compared with Proofpoint Email Protection, Cisco Secure Email, Valimail Monitor, Abnormal Security and Mimecast Email Security. See our Barracuda Email Security Gateway vs. Fortra's Agari report.
We monitor all Secure Email Gateway (SEG) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.