We performed a comparison between Amazon SQS and VMware Tanzu Data Services based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I am able to find out what's going on very easily."
"The solution is easy to scale and cost-effective."
"The libraries that connect and manage the queues are rich in features."
"SQS is very stable, and it has lots of features."
"I appreciate that Amazon SQS is fully integrated with Amazon and can be accessed through normal functions or serverless functions, making it very user-friendly. Additionally, the features are comparable to those of other solutions."
"We use SNS as the publisher, and our procurement service subscribes to those events using SQS. In the past, we relied on time-based or batch-based processes to send data between services on-premises. With SQS, we can trigger actions based on real-time changes in business processes, improving reliability."
"There is no setup just some easy configuration required."
"One of the useful features is the ability to schedule a call after a certain number of messages accumulate in the container. For example, if there are ten messages in the container, you can perform a specific action."
"The most valuable feature is that it's really customizable."
"We have been able to set up a messaging system that facilitates data integration between the software modules that we sell."
"Simple and straightforward admin portals: Made it easy for users and worked out excellently for our requirements"
"Reliability for the messages is key. RabbitMQ ensures your messages are safe. They are not deleted and stuff."
"The product's feature of data transaction works fast."
"The stability of this solution was very good."
"The security is great."
"The most valuable feature for us is horizontal scaling."
"There are some issues with SQS's transaction queue regarding knowing if something has been received."
"Support could be improved."
"Sending or receiving messages takes some time, and it could be quicker."
"The initial setup of Amazon SQS is in the middle range of difficulty. You need to learn Amazon AWS and know how to navigate, create resources, and structures, and provide rules."
"The solution is not available on-premises so that rules out any customers looking for the messaging solution on-premises."
"It would be easier to have a dashboard that allows us to see everything and manage everything since we have so many queues."
"I do not think that this solution is easy to use and the documentation of this solution has a lot of problems and can be improved in the next release. Most of the time, the images in the document are from older versions."
"The current visibility timeout of five minutes is okay. However, I'd like to explore the possibility of extending it for specific use cases."
"It will be very useful if we could communicate with other database types from Greenplum (using a database link)."
"There are some security concerns that have been raised with this product."
"The debugging capabilities and testing flexibilities need to be improved."
"Initial setup is a little complex. It took around two weeks to deploy."
"This solution struggled with multi-regional synchronization."
"When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."
"The initial setup is somewhat complex and the out-of-the-box configuration requires optimization."
"The installation is difficult and should be made easier."
Amazon SQS is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 13 reviews while VMware Tanzu Data Services is ranked 3rd in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 81 reviews. Amazon SQS is rated 8.2, while VMware Tanzu Data Services is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon SQS writes "Stable, useful interface, and scales well". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Tanzu Data Services writes "Reliable queueing functionality and versatile tool that can be used with any programming languages ". Amazon SQS is most compared with Redis, Apache Kafka, Amazon MQ and Anypoint MQ, whereas VMware Tanzu Data Services is most compared with IBM MQ, Anypoint MQ, Apache Kafka, Red Hat AMQ and ActiveMQ. See our Amazon SQS vs. VMware Tanzu Data Services report.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
