We performed a comparison between Appian and KiSSFLOW based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Since implementing we have had a faster time to solution, with fewer resources needed."
"It's heavy on business processing in terms of logic, process workflows, and primarily on the process design modeler. Appian is really great at that. In terms of the full stack set from a low-code platform perspective, it's definitely an eye opener since it can be deployed via mobile app and on the web as well."
"Low code development: Code can be developed pretty quickly which leads to less turnaround time for automation of business processes."
"The initial setup was seamless. We didn't run into any hardships at all."
"It has very flexible adaptation and the ability to save and automate processes."
"Good workflow engines that bridge the gaps of processes."
"The application life cycle is very clear. I started learning it and giving some workshops to my team. Creating the users and the building is very structured. Documentation is nice and it's easy to learn."
"The process models provide self-documenting systems."
"The support team responds fast."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"The flexibility and speed in modifying and creating processes are great features. If we have a process in mind, we can usually create it within ten minutes."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"The most valuable feature is APIs. Its integrations are very flexible, allowing developers to connect multiple applications like DocuSign, Salesforce, OpenText, and SEB."
"A point of improvement would be the SAIL forms. The built-in tool used to generate forms does not have debugging support (to view local variables as they change on live preview, and step-by-step valuation) which is a big drawback for form development. Moreover, the script language used to build SAIL forms does not support inheritance or lambda expressions (functions as arguments of other functions), which makes the code base more verbose."
"We would like to see more reduced latency. We would like to make sure that the scale-out factor will be much more as workloads come in."
"We have clients that want to use Office 365, Microsoft Analytics, and Power Apps. Appian just isn't the same as using something specifically designed to cater to the Microsoft Suite."
"It is difficult to set up the on-premise version."
"Form creation and SAIL proprietary language still basically require programming. The claim a BA type can do everything is hogwash."
"The product’s pricing could be improved from the developers' perspective."
"I would like to see more features for enterprises. They would also benefit from adding documentation and training on their site."
"It needs better integration with our existing application ecosystem."
"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."
"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."
"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
Appian is ranked 4th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews while KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Appian is rated 8.4, while KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Appian writes "Low resource consumption, easy setup, and stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". Appian is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, OutSystems, Camunda, ServiceNow and Pega BPM, whereas KiSSFLOW is most compared with Camunda, Microsoft Power Apps, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform and Bizagi. See our Appian vs. KiSSFLOW report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, best Rapid Application Development Software vendors, and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.