We performed a comparison between KiSSFLOW and Microsoft Power Apps based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The user interface is very, very good."
"Kissflow has reduced the bottleneck around getting approval for certain items in the company."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"The support team responds fast."
"The most valuable feature is the completeness of the concept. It is not restricted by where you are allowed to use it and that is its greatest strength."
"The most valuable features are low-code and fast development."
"The cloud aspect has been great. We don't have to do a lot of research in order to begin integrations. It's so easy to integrate with other solutions."
"You can easily connect Power Apps with other databases, like Excel, SharePoint, SQL, etc."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"It is easy to design automation processes."
"The support is the most valuable feature."
"It’s a stable product."
"They should increase their marketplace with existing tools so that connections are directly through connectors instead of API integrations."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"One area where I believe Kissflow can be improved is customization."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user."
"One of the major problems with it is what PowerApps calls the delegation warning. Regardless of what platform, data source, et cetera, that you're using, you can't retrieve more than 2000 records."
"The notion people have is that no code equals no knowledge, and that's simply not true. Even though you don't have to write codes, you still have to know what you're doing."
"The solution should move to the next step in its maturity model and include mobile versions for Android and iOS."
"In some cases, PowerApps would have some limitations in terms of the data, the number of transactions, and so on, but for a normal solution, it would be enough."
"There is room for improvement with the amount of code required to implement the expense classification app."
"We'd like more features and less to no coding."
"The pricing structure needs to be improved, the current information is confusing."
"PowerApps can't do a lot of things that users need now. For example, it can't handle signatures."
KiSSFLOW is ranked 14th in Rapid Application Development Software with 12 reviews while Microsoft Power Apps is ranked 1st in Rapid Application Development Software with 77 reviews. KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Power Apps is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Power Apps writes "Low-code, low learning curve, and reduces manpower". KiSSFLOW is most compared with Camunda, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform, OutSystems and Appian, whereas Microsoft Power Apps is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Mendix, ServiceNow, Appian and Microsoft Azure App Service. See our KiSSFLOW vs. Microsoft Power Apps report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.