We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and Symphony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Social Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The customization that Confluence offers is one of its most useful features. You can customise it based on the specific project you are working on. It also supports multiple languages."
"The solution is stable."
"We have found limiting permissions and history very valuable."
"It integrates well with other Atlassian products"
"What I like the most is the Wiki software that comes with Atlassian Confluence."
"We value the way we can tag documentation to Jira because we can cross-reference a Jira ticket to a Confluence page, and we can also add a Confluence page to a Jira ticket."
"The search functionality is a really powerful feature."
"Easy to share information and the integration with JIRA is good."
"I found the RAM Commander module in Symphony to be the most valuable."
"Symphony and Laravel are the most comfortable frameworks for any developer. It is also lightweight."
"The overall functions are good."
"The entire product is good."
"The solution is user-friendly, and it is very good security-wise."
"An area for improvement would be the intuitiveness of using the features, especially if you want to customize."
"We would like there to be more advanced data manipulation features available in this solution, such as creating more complex charts, and a column freezing option."
"Managing user permissions and credentials could be easier."
"In the next release, I would like to have the ability to import pictures."
"Atlassian Confluence could improve the stability, there are timeouts sometimes."
"This is kind of by design, however, the lack of control in terms of editing the page to make it look the way you want it to look is an issue. It would be nice if there was more flexibility there."
"The UX is a little bit all over the place."
"The solution is not very user-friendly."
"The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved."
"The solution needs to improve CI."
"Compared to established vendors, it lacks user flexibility and customization, especially in the PM module."
"To improve the situation, enhancing the functionality for integrating with other applications and addressing ticketing issues is crucial."
"The area that needs to be improved is modular asset management. When we are uploading the assets in bulk, it is not aligned."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Social Software with 99 reviews while Symphony is ranked 8th in Enterprise Social Software with 5 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while Symphony is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symphony writes "Makes tasks like network planning and performance monitoring much easier". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, SharePoint and Zendesk, whereas Symphony is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Slack and Drupal. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. Symphony report.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
