We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and Symphony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Social Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I use the solution for messaging and chatting."
"Valuable screen sharing feature."
"It is an excellent all-around communications tool that works well for business purposes."
"Using the solution's screen-sharing feature, we can go through a document together and take control."
"SharePoint is the most important thing of the solution where you can share your data. I am also impressed with the real-time transcript feature."
"This solution is great for ad hoc video conferencing. It's so easy to start a meeting."
"It is a stable solution."
"You can add teams to a conversation. You can create reports, project plans, or many other things based on Microsoft solutions. It has improved communication between teams and within each team."
"I found the RAM Commander module in Symphony to be the most valuable."
"The solution is user-friendly, and it is very good security-wise."
"The overall functions are good."
"Symphony and Laravel are the most comfortable frameworks for any developer. It is also lightweight."
"The entire product is good."
"At times, we encounter difficulties with remote access through Teams, which requires improvement."
"Adding and integrating more apps like SharePoint on Microsoft Teams is making the solution very slow."
"Whiteboard tool not embedded in the solution."
"If it's a group chat, then we can record the session, but we cannot record a one on one session."
"Microsoft Teams withdrew the Wiki function, which was quite a good and useful feature."
"It could be improved if it was easier to use and the interface was revamped."
"It may be a little daunting to learn and is still a tool in development."
"The product should improve its pricing."
"The area that needs to be improved is modular asset management. When we are uploading the assets in bulk, it is not aligned."
"Compared to established vendors, it lacks user flexibility and customization, especially in the PM module."
"To improve the situation, enhancing the functionality for integrating with other applications and addressing ticketing issues is crucial."
"The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved."
"The solution needs to improve CI."
Microsoft Teams is ranked 1st in Enterprise Social Software with 145 reviews while Symphony is ranked 8th in Enterprise Social Software with 5 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while Symphony is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symphony writes "Makes tasks like network planning and performance monitoring much easier". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Loom, Chatter and Huddle, whereas Symphony is most compared with Slack, Drupal and SharePoint. See our Microsoft Teams vs. Symphony report.
See our list of best Enterprise Social Software vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Social Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
